eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2022
vol. 18
 
Share:
Share:
Image in intervention

Conservative treatment of anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with a large thrombus burden in the left main coronary artery

Karol Serafin
1
,
Wojciech Zimoch
1, 2
,
Wiktor Kuliczkowski
1, 2
,
Krzysztof Reczuch
1, 3

  1. Institute of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw University Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland
  2. Institute of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
  3. Institute of Heart Diseases, Jan Mikulicz-Radecki University Teaching Hospital, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
Adv Interv Cardiol 2022; 18, 3 (69): 311–313
Online publish date: 2022/11/08
Article file
Get citation
 
 

We present a case of a 45-year-old man, who was admitted due to anterior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction of 3 h duration. Coronary angiography showed a normal RCA, thrombotic occlusion of the distal circumflex artery (Cx) and a massive thrombus in the distal left main artery (LM) protruding to the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) with preserved distal flow (Figure 1 A). Cautious, but unsuccessful thrombus aspiration (Hunter 6F) was performed. As the patient was stable he was qualified for further conservative treatment with administration of 72-hour infusion of eptifibatide, enoxaparin, acetylsalicylic acid and prasugrel. Echocardiography revealed extensive regional contractility abnormalities of the left ventricle with reduced ejection fraction (38%). Laboratory results showed a maximal troponin I (TnI) level of 83 355 pg/ml.

Figure 1

A – coronary angiography showing a massive thrombus in the distal left main coronary artery trunk, proximal left anterior descending and chronic total occlusion of distal left circumflex; B – coronary angiography eleven days after admission, no thrombus visible; C – optical coherence tomography showing a wall-mounted thrombus in the left main coronary artery trunk

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/48136/PWKI-18-48136-g001_min.jpg

After 4 days repeated coronary angiography showed only slight reduction of the thrombus. Based on this result the patient was discussed by the local Heart Team and qualified for pharmacotherapy continuation and another coronary angiography again in a few days.

Eleven days after admission, the second follow-up was performed, in which no LM thrombus was visible (Figure 1 B). OCT showed presence of a non-flow limiting fibrotic plaque (< 30% stenosis) in the LM and LAD with wall-mounted red thrombus and small elements of white thrombus (Figure 1 C). We did not observe plaque rupture, dissections or any other features of plaque instability. Taking the result into consideration the patient was qualified for conservative treatment without stent implantation.

At the follow-up 3 months after hospitalization the patient reported only mild dyspnea during physical activity without recurrence of chest pain or other major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Follow-up echocardiography showed a non-enlarged left ventricle with slightly reduced ejection fraction (44%).

Angiographic evidence of thrombus can be seen in 91.6% of patients who present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [1]. The use of OCT is essential to reveal the underlying pathophysiology, and optimize therapeutic options [2]. Massive intracoronary thrombus has been reported in 16.4% of patients with acute coronary syndrome [3]. The recommended treatment for patients presenting with STEMI is timely primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including stent implantation, but in some patients the coronary flow may be restored and stabilized without stenting [4]. Coronary lesions causing STEMI, in general, have a luminal stenosis of less than 75% [5]. Thus, the risk of a plaque rupture with formation of thrombus and subsequent myocardial infarction is not determined by the degree of luminal stenosis, but by the plaque content [6].

In patients with a large thrombus burden the deferred strategy may potentially limit the risk of distal coronary embolization. This can allow 24–48 h of intense antithrombotic therapy, including prolonged intravenous GPIIb/IIIa inhibition and heparin. In some cases with a short ischemia time thrombolysis is a valid therapeutic option. Subsequent angiography frequently shows reduced thrombus burden and allows one to perform intracoronary imaging and PCI with a significantly lower risk of distal embolization. As shown in the recent analysis of the DANAMI-3-DEFER study deferred stenting was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, target vessel revascularization, or recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with preserved flow and residual stenosis < 30% [7].

In conclusion, there is no ideal management strategy for the present case. In general, potent dual antiplatelet agents must be used and effective anticoagulation should be maintained. Manual thrombectomy is usually the first line-treatment. If it fails and a large thrombus burden remains with preserved distal flow and without ongoing ischemia, GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors and heparin infusion should be maintained for 24–48 h. This strategy allows one to “buy some time” for the patient and finally choose the best treatment option, as in the present case.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Daemen J, et al. Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of thrombus burden. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 573-83.

2 

Triantafyllis AS, Kalogeris AN, Haeck JDE, et al. Optical coherence tomography guided thrombectomy through a “home-made” aspiration catheter in a young patient with myocardial infarction. To stent or not to stent? Adv Interv Cardiol 2020; 16: 486-90.

3 

Miranda-Guardiola F, Rossi A, Serra A, et al. Angiographic quantification of thrombus in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction presenting with an occluded infarct-related artery and its relationship with results of percutaneous intervention. J Interv Cardiol 2009; 22: 207-15.

4 

Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 119-77.

5 

Libby P. Mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes and their implications for therapy. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 2004-13.

6 

Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 226-35.

7 

Madsen JM, Kelbæk H, Nepper-Christensen L, et al. Clinical outcomes of no stenting in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing deferred primary percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention 2022; 18: 482-91.

Copyright: © 2022 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.