4/2014
vol. 11
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING The place of indirect venography tests after pulmonary computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis
of pulmonary thromboemboli
Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska 2014; 11 (4): 445-451
Online publish date: 2014/11/30
Get citation
PlumX metrics:
Introduction
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequently seen condition, which is difficult to diagnose and treat and has high mortality [1]. In most patients, PE is not seen in isolation, but develops as a complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the lower extremities [2]. There is current widespread use of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the diagnosis of PE and the first and basic images of Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) in determining DVT [3-5]. In recent years, in CTA applied to patients for PE, the venous structures below the level of the diaphragm are evaluated from the obtained CT slices after waiting a certain time. By this method of indirect CT venography (CTV), thromboses in the deep venous system causing PE can be examined immediately after pulmonary CTA without any need for the use of additional contrast materials [2, 6].
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of CTV imaging of lower extremity DVT, applied following pulmonary CTA, in patients clinically evaluated at high/moderate risk of PE and to compare it to CDUS.
Material and methods
Study population
The study comprised 80 patients (42 males, mean age 58 years; 38 females, mean age 63 years) who were directed to the Radiology CT Unit for a pulmonary CTA test, having been clinically evaluated as being at high/moderate risk for PE between November 2006 and July 2007. The clinical potential of all patients had been calculated by the Chest Diseases Department according to the methods and scales defined below (Table I). The study consisted of patients with a score of at least one high/moderate clinical probability.
Examination technique
Ultrasonography technique
Lower extremity CDUS examination was made of all patients before or within 24 hours after pulmonary CTA. By evaluating the lower extremity deep venous system in respect of DVT from both main femoral veins to the level of distal popliteal trifurcation, the age and anatomic location of any thrombus present was reported.
In the first stage, the wall structure of the veins, the echogenicity in the lumen, the vein diameter, response to compression and respiratory diameter changes were evaluated with gray scale ultrasonography. In the second stage, the color filling and flow forms were evaluated with CDUS. Diagnosis of thrombus was made from direct visualization of the thrombus in the lumen, and absence of or reduced response to compression. Auxiliary diagnostic criteria were defined as vascular response to augmentation, color filling and spectral flow forms (Fig. 1C). All the ultrasonographic examinations were performed using an HDI 5000 and 11 (ATL, Bothell, ABD) ultrasonography device with advanced technology properties of high resolution and a wide band 7-12 MHz probe. The CDUS examination was evaluated by a senior radiology assistant with at least one year’s experience.
Computed tomography venography technique
The CT tests were performed in the radiology unit with a 4-channel multidetector M8000 CT device (Philips, Holland). Before the CT examination, a vein in the forearm of all patients was opened with an 18-20 G catheter and 120-140 ml of non-ionic contrast dye was administered at 4 ml/s with an automatic injector. After injection of the contrast dye, taking of the slices was started with a 15-20 second delay.
During the examination, the patients were instructed to hold their breath. The examination was made with the patient in a supine position, and to prevent subclavian vein compression, the arm into which the injection had been made was held at the side and the other arm at the level of the head. Images were taken at 1.5 pitch value and 1.3 mm slice thickness from the apex of the lungs to the level of the diaphragm. Dosage parameters of 120-150 kVp and 350-400 mA were used depending on the weight of the patient. The CTA test of the lower extremity area from the iliac crest to the distal third of the leg was made 3-3.5 minutes after the CTA images were taken. During this procedure additional contrast dye was not used. The CTV images were obtained in a caudo-cranial direction at 7.5 mm slice thickness and 1.5 pitch value.
Computed tomography venography evaluation
Evaluation of pulmonary CTA was performed by a specialist radiologist and a final year radiology assistant, each without any knowledge of the other. Cases which were evaluated differently were again discussed and a consensual agreement was made. The observation of a hypodense filled defect within the vein on consecutive CTV slices (Fig. 1A and 2A) was accepted as a direct diagnostic criterion for DVT (Fig. 1B, 2B and 2C). Auxiliary diagnostic criteria were venous widening, infiltration in the perivenous fat tissue, and lack of wall and segmental staining [2]. According to these criteria, the presence and location of DVT were defined.
Statistical analysis
Accepting the CDUS results as the gold standard, they were compared with the CTV results. The values of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood of giving a true positive result and likelihood of giving a true negative result were calculated. To determine the correlation between the CDUS results and the CTV results, the Spearman correlation test was performed using SPSS (version 11.0) software.
Results
The study comprised 80 patients of whom 42 (52%) were male with a mean age of 58.38 years and 38 (48%) were female with a mean age of 63 years. In the pulmonary CTA test, PE was determined in 19 (23%) patients. According to the Well clinical classification, PE was determined in 6 (60%) of 10 high clinical probability patients, in the Geneva clinical classification, in 1 (17%) of 6 high clinical probability patients, and in the Miniati clinical classification, in 6 (67%) of 9 high clinical probability patients. Deep vein thrombosis and/or PE were not determined in any patient defined as being at low risk of possible PE in more than one clinical classification. The distribution of PE clinical probability according to the clinical classifications is shown in Table II.
According to the pulmonary CTA findings, a total of 110 (62%) images of total, partial and subsegmental filled defects in the lumen thought to be consistent with PE were observed in the right lung and 67 (38%) in the left lung (Table III). In both lungs the most frequently observed segment with PE findings was the anterior lobe posterobasal segment at 21 (19%) in the right lung and 14 (16%) in the left lung.
The CTV and CDUS results of the patients were compared for evaluation (Table IV). According to this, 9 patients were diagnosed with DVT from both CTV and CDUS. In 6 patients with normal CDUS examination results, findings of DVT were seen on CTV. It was noted that of the 6 patients diagnosed with DVT from CTV, which was not observed on CDUS, PE was present in 5 patients. Of these patients, 1 was wearing a plaster cast, 1 was seriously obese and 1 had evident edema in both legs.
The evaluation of the comparison of CTV test results when CDUS was taken as the clinical gold standard is shown in Table V. To determine the correlation between the CDUS results and the CTV results, the Spearman correlation test was performed using SPSS (version 11.0) software. A significant level of correlation was observed (r = 0.741, p < 0.001).
The results of the comparison of the CTA and CTV tests are shown in Table VI. In 11 patients determined with PE in CTA, DVT was found in the CTV examination. There was PE in 4 patients where DVT was not determined by either imaging method. In 8 patients where DVT was not seen with either CTV or CDUS, PE was determined with CTA.
The CTV and CDUS evaluations separately examined the pelvic, above-the-knee, popliteal and crural areas (Table VII). In respect of DVT, while positive findings were determined on CTV in the pelvic and crural veins in 3 and 7 patients respectively, thrombus was observed in only 1 patient with CDUS. In both examinations, findings of DVT were most often in the above-the-knee location (CTV, 12 patients; CDUS, 8 patients). With CTV thrombus was encountered the least frequently in the pelvic area.
When thoracic findings from pulmonary CTA apart from PE were evaluated (Table VIII), the most commonly determined pathologies were pleural effusion and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There were findings of pleural effusion in 8 patients and of COPD in 1 of the 19 patients with PE. Pulmonary infarct was determined in 7 patients.
Discussion
Nowadays, there is increasing application of CTA and lower extremity CTV testing in the same session [9]. In this method, known as combined CTA and CTV, following pulmonary CTA applied for PE, 3-5 min after starting the injection of contrast dye, the venous system between the diaphragm and the popliteal area is scanned at 5-10 mm slice thickness and 1-5 cm slice intervals [2, 6]. Different studies have reported sensitivity of this method in respect of DVT as 89-100% and specificity as 94-100% [2, 6, 10].
Studies show variations in the area examined by CTV. Some have examined the areas below the diaphragm as far as the popliteal area [2], while others have restricted the examination to between the iliac crest and the popliteal area [6]. In a study by Nchimi et al. of 1408 patients investigating the most frequent location of DVT, image slices were taken from the calf veins as far as the level of the diaphragm. Deep vein thrombosis was found below the knee in 48% of cases, between the knee and inguinal ligament in 36%, and above the inguinal ligament in only 15%.
From the results of the studies, it was reported that the optimal CTV test should include the area from the calf veins to the iliac crest [11]. We realized that the areas of potential DVT in the veins of the deep calf and pelvic area were not examined in routine CDUS applications, so these areas were included in the current study. Thus, iliac vein thrombus was observed in 2 patients with CTV, which had not been determined in CDUS. When other studies in the literature were examined, the first study was seen to be that of Loud et al. in 1998 [8]. That study was conducted on only 5 patients. In 2 patients with PE observed together with DVT, thrombus was seen on both CTV and CDUS. Opaque appearance of the veins could be achieved at an adequate level in 4 patients. They observed that the application of CTV additional to routine CDUS provided information related to pelvic and abdominal veins.
There are 2 studies which can provide examples on this point. The first is a study by Cham et al. [12] of 541 cases with suspected PE. Pulmonary CTA and CTV images were obtained from 7 separate centers using 4 different CT machines with the same parameters. Although CTV was applied to all the patients at the same time, 116 patients were evaluated with CDUS within 1 week. Deep vein thrombosis was determined in 45 (8%) patients and PE in 91 (17%) patients. While PE was not observed in 16 of the patients diagnosed with DVT from CTV, early diagnosis allowed for the application of appropriate treatment. Thus a result was reached of a 16% increase in thromboembolism diagnosis with CTV. Of the patients who underwent CDUS examination, 15 (13%) were examined with both imaging methods. In 4 patients, DVT diagnosis was made from only CTV examination. The observed DVT locations reported were similar to those of the current study. According to the results of the current study, the CTV test provided early diagnosis and possibility of treatment, particularly in the patient group where DVT was determined but PE had not been determined. Thus in the current study, early diagnosis and a start to treatment was provided for 4 (17%) patients.
The other series was published by Loud et al. [2]. In a study of 650 patients, CDUS could be applied to 308 patients. Pulmonary embolism, DVT or both were found in 8% of patients. Pulmonary embolism only was determined in 4% of patients and DVT only in 5%. As a result of correlation of CDUS of patients, CTV was found to have 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity. A wrong negative result was found with CTV in the main femoral vein and the superficial femoral vein in 2 patients with PE. When the distribution of DVT determined with CTV was examined, the fewest findings (17%) were determined in the iliac vein and its proximity.
Of these, isolated thrombus was observed in the iliac vein and/or the inferior vena cava in 3 patients with PE. In conclusion, it was reported that the CTV test was effective in the determination of thrombus in the lower extremity, particularly in the pelvic and abdominal veins. In the current study, DVT was observed with CTV in the pelvic veins in 3 patients, whereas DVT was seen with CDUS in only 1 patient. When these 2 extensive series were compared with the current study, the distribution of DVT location was similar. The general conclusion of these 3 studies was that CDUS is insufficient in the pelvic veins.
Some researchers have reported that as the sensitivity and specificity of CTV have been found to be low in the determination of DVT, CDUS examination may be an alternative. In a study by Garcia-Bolado et al., CTV sensitivity was found to be 58.8%, specificity 95%, positive predictive value 66.7% and negative predictive value 93.2%. Supporting these results, it was reported that CDUS should be selected for patients thought to have a diagnosis of DVT [13]. In a retrospective study by Peterson et al. [14], CTV sensitivity was found to be 71%, specificity 93%, positive predictive value 53% and negative predictive value 97%. In that study of 137 patients, diagnosis of DVT was made with CTV in 10 patients and with CDUS in 8 patients. As CDUS is more advantageous in terms of costs while the CTV test was sensitive but not specific and the positive predictive value was low, they stated that CDUS should be preferred for suspected DVT.
In the current study, thrombus was determined with CTV in 18% of patients. In the literature, this rate varies from 8 to 19%. The reason for the higher rate of DVT observed with CTV may be that the patients of the current study were selected by evaluation of the Chest Diseases Department. In addition, 4 patients were determined with DVT on CTV but PE was not seen on pulmonary CTA, which was found to contribute 0.5% to the rate of thromboembolic disease diagnosis of CTV. In the literature this rate varies from 2% to 4.3%.
The current study has some limitations. Although conventional angiography is known to be the gold standard in the diagnosis of DVT, its use is restricted nowadays as it is an invasive method. Therefore, as in previous similar studies, CDUS was accepted as the gold standard as it is known to have high accuracy and diagnostic value in the determination of DVT. The radiation dose received by the patients was not calculated in this study. However, previous studies in the literature have reported dosage values in a normal extremity CT examination not to be excessive, varying from 7.25 to 8.26 mSV. As these values are at an acceptable level, no separate radiation dose calculation was made.
Conclusions
The CTV test performed after pulmonary CTA has high diagnostic value in the determination of DVT. Computed tomography venography is a rapid imaging method which can be an alternative to CDUS, particularly in some cases where CDUS application and evaluation remain insufficient.
Disclosure
Authors report no conflict of interest.
References
1. Dalen JE, Alpert JS. Natural history of pulmonary embolism. Prog Cardiovasc Surg 1975; 17: 259-270.
2. Loud PA, Katz DS, Klippenstein DL, Shah RD, Grossman ZD. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography in suspected thromboembolic disease: diagnostic accuracy for deep venous evaluation. AJR 2000; 174: 61-65.
3. Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous trombosis. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 663-668.
4. David BP, Michael AR. Vascular ultrasound. The Surgical Clinics of North America 1998; 48: 273-281.
5. Task Force report. European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1302-1336.
6. Duwe KM, Shiau M, Budorick NE, Austin JHM, Berkmen YM. Evaluation of the lower extremity veins in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a retrospective comparison of helical CT venography and sonography. AJR 2000; 175: 1525-1531.
7. Moser KM. Venous thromboembolism. Sate of the art. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 141: 235-249.
8. Loud PA, Grossman ZD, Klippenstein DL, Ray CE. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography: a new diagnostic technique for suspected thromboembolic disease. AJR 1998; 170: 951-954.
9. Dodd JD. Evidence-based Practice in Radiology: Steps 3 and 4 – Appraise and Apply Diagnostic Radiology Literature. Radiology 2007; 242: 342-354.
10. Garg K, Kemp JL, Wojcik D, Hoehn S, Johnston RJ, Macey LC, Baron AE. Thromboembolic disease: comparison of combined CT pulmonary angiography and venography with bilateral leg sonography in 70 patients. AJR 2000; 175: 997-1001.
11. Nchimi A, Ghaye B, Noukoua CT, Dondelinger RF. Incidence and distribution of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis at indirect computed tomography venography in patients suspected of pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2007; 97: 566-572.
12. Cham MD, Yankelevitz DF, Shaham D, Shah AA, Sherman L, Lewis A, Rademaker J, Pearson G, Choi J, Wolff W, Prabhu PM, Galanski M, Clark RA, Sostman HD, Henschke CI. Deep venous thrombosis: detection by using indirect CT venography. Radiology 2000; 216: 744-751.
13. Garcia-Bolado A, Del Cura JL. CT venography vs ultrasound in the diagnosis of thromboembolic disease in patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism. Emerg Radiol 2007; 14: 403-409.
14. Peterson DA, Kazerooni EA, Wakefield TW, Knipp BS, Forauer AR, Bailey BJ, Sullivan VV, Proctor MC, Henke PK, Greenfield LJ, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR Jr. Computed tomographic venography is specific but not sensitive for diagnosis of acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis in patients with suspected pulmonary embolus. J Vasc Surg 2001; 34: 798-804.
Copyright: © 2014 Polish Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons (Polskie Towarzystwo KardioTorakochirurgów) and the editors of the Polish Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
|
|