eISSN: 1731-2531
ISSN: 1642-5758
Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2023
vol. 55
 
Share:
Share:
Special paper

Echocardiography and Ultrasound Committee statement for the accreditation programme in point-of-care ultrasonography in Poland

Mateusz Zawadka
1
,
Paweł Andruszkiewicz
1
,
Wojciech Gola
2
,
Adrian Wong
3
,
Mirosław Czuczwar
4

1.
2nd Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
2.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
3.
Department of Critical Care, King’s College Hospital, London, UK; The ESICM General Intensive care Ultrasound (GENIUS)
4.
2nd Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2023; 55, 2: 77–80
Online publish date: 2023/06/21
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Ultrasonography (US) is now an important component of the assessment of critically ill patients [15]. Over the past decade, there has been continual improvement in US technology and greater clinical implementation [4] alongside more structured training for practitioners. Indeed, several accreditation pathways are now available specifically for critically ill patients [6, 7]. In parallel, there is a growing body of scientific evidence supporting the use of multi-modal, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the assessment, diagnostics, and procedural aspects of managing patients [3, 820].

In 2020, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and the Emergency Care Research Institute recognised the implementation of POCUS without the necessary safeguards as a major health risk [4]. These include the provision of a structured way for acquiring competencies and evaluation of skills to ensure safe practice.

The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) recognised the need to include POCUS as an essential competency for the European Intensive Care Medicine (ICM) specialist. In 2022, they updated Competency Based Training in Intensive Care (CoBaTrICe) and proposed the minimum standard of knowledge, skills, and attitudes required for a doctor to be identified as a specialist in ICM in Europe [21].

The aim of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy (PTAiIT) Ultrasound and Echocardiography Committee (UEC) recommendations is to:

  • define essential POCUS competencies for anaesthesia and intensive care specialists and trainees in Poland,

  • propose an accreditation process for POCUS training,

  • outline evaluation of competencies.

RECOMMENDATIONS

UEC recommendations are based on the current scientific evidence and international guidelines for the general ICM population:

  • Competency Based Training in Intensive Care (CoBaTrICe) [21],

  • ESICM: Basic ultrasound head-to-toe skills for intensivists in the general and neurointensive care unit population [5],

  • ESICM: Recommendations for core critical care ultrasound competencies as a part of specialist training in multidisciplinary intensive care: a framework proposed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine [22].

DISCREPANCIES

The 2021 ESICM consensus and expert recommendations produce one statement recommending the use of transcranial color-coded duplex (TCCD) insonation of the middle cerebral artery as a basic skill for qualitative waveform analysis and to measure the pulsatility index to rule out intracranial hypertension impairing cerebral perfusion (weak recommendation). UEC recognised the utility of TCCD and diaphragmatic ultrasound and will re-evaluate the feasibility of inclusion in the basic competencies in the Polish accreditation programme.

POLISH DIPLOMA OF CRITICAL ULTRASOUND

The essential POCUS competencies for anaesthesiology and intensive care specialists and trainees in Poland are defined as the Polish Diploma of Critical Ultrasound (PDCU).

The PDCU consists of four domains (cardiac, thorax, abdomen, and blood vessels) and each domain has defined ultrasound signs that candidates must be able to recognise (Table 1).

TABLE 1

Basic competencies in the Polish Diploma of Critical Ultrasound (PDCU)

Thorax
PneumothoraxPleural line sliding, lung point, lung pulse, B-lines
Pleural effusionQuantitative and qualitative assessment, ultrasound-guided drain placement
Interstitial syndromeB-line, multiple B-lines, coalescence B-lines, waterfall sign, tissue-like pattern, lung ultrasound score
ConsolidationLocalisation, size, bronchogram
Cardiac
PatternsHypovolaemia, LV failure, RV failure, pericardial tamponade, cor pulmonale, severe valvular abnormalities
Left ventricleShape, size, thickness, systolic function (qualitative), systolic dysfunction, valves assessment (colour Doppler)
Right ventricleShape, size, thickness, systolic function, TAPSE, RV/LV ratio
Inferior vena cavaSize, respiratory variability, SAX/LAX
Abdomen
AortaAbdominal aorta aneurysm
UrinaryHydronephrosis, bladder volume
Free fluidFAST, paracentesis
Vessels
CannulationReal-time guidance SAX/LAX, artery, peripheral vessels, central access
Deep vein thrombosis3-point compression test

[i] SAX – short axis, LAX – long axis, LV – left ventricle, RV – right ventricle, TAPSE – tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion

MODULAR STRUCTURE

To accommodate different educational and skillset needs, a structured pathway for accreditation in POCUS was created. The core competencies are included in the PDCU and consist of basic US in cardiac, chest, abdomen, and blood vessels. Developing competencies in all four domains is required for the certification with PDCU (Figure 1). Essential competencies for the use of ultrasound devices are defined in Table 2.

FIGURE 1

Modular structure of the Polish Diploma of Critical Ultrasound (PDCU)

/f/fulltexts/AIT/50859/AIT-55-50859-g001_min.jpg
TABLE 2

Essential competencies for the use of ultrasound devices

Ultrasound machineBasic components and controls, ECG
Sound generationPiezo-electric effects, probes, modalities
PhysicsFrequency, amplitude, wavelength, propagation
Ultrasound in imagingInterferences, reflection, attenuation, artefacts
Image qualityFocus, gain, frame rate, resolution
DopplerColour Doppler, theory of PW and CW
Image descriptionEchogenicity, localization
Image storageAcquisition, export, conversion,
Probe manipulationSliding, fanning, rocking, rotating
SafetyHeat generation, disinfection

[i] W – continuous wave Doppler, PW – pulsed wave Doppler

ACCREDITATION PROCESS

For the PDCU, candidates should undertake a structured process of acquiring competencies by learning, practising, and evaluating.

The entry criteria for the certification process are:

  • be a specialist or trainee in recognised specialties,

  • attend an ultrasound course recognised by the UEC and have an identified mentor.

After acceptance for the certification process, candidates will have to collect a logbook consisting of cases in cardiac, thorax, abdominal, and vascular ultrasound. On completion of a logbook, candidates’ competencies will be signed off by the supervisor and mentor (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2

Overview of the Polish Diploma of Critical Ultrasound (PDCU) accreditation process

/f/fulltexts/AIT/50859/AIT-55-50859-g002_min.jpg

SUPERVISORS AND MENTORS

The role of a supervisor is to oversee the accreditation process as a whole: logbook co-signing with a mentor, and competency assessment. Supervisors will be appointed by the UEC.

Mentors are responsible for supporting trainees locally to obtain competencies in each domain. Mentors should be chosen from the same institution as a trainee to allow for hands-on training and regular feedback. A mentor could be any physician with PDCU or recognised ultrasound competencies as a part of the specialty training. There could be a different mentor for each domain.

The role of mentors is to:

  • communicate with the supervisor on trainee progress,

  • enable access to the ultrasound machine and patients,

  • review logbooks,

  • make recommendations for completing each module.

ASSESSMENT PROCESS

There is a continuous assessment based on the logbook and triggered assessment. PDCU will be granted to successful trainees who have fulfilled the requirements and logbook, and triggered assessments were signed off by mentors and the supervisor in all modules.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Assistance with the article

none.

Financial support and sponsorship

none.

Conflicts of interest

none.

Presentation

none.

References

1 

Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, et al.; International Liaison Committee on Lung Ultrasound (ILC-LUS) for International Consensus Conference on Lung Ultrasound (ICC-LUS). International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 577-591. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2513-4.

2 

Price S, Via G, Sloth E, et al.; World Interactive Network Focused On Critical UltraSound ECHO-ICU Group. Echocardiography practice, training and accreditation in the intensive care: document for the World Interactive Network Focused on Critical Ultrasound (WINFOCUS). Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2008; 6: 49. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-6-49.

3 

Robba C, Poole D, Citerio G, Taccone FS, Rasulo FA; Consensus on brain ultrasonography in critical care group. Brain ultrasonography consensus on skill recommendations and competence levels within the critical care setting. Neurocrit Care 2020; 32: 502-511. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00766-9.

4 

Díaz-Gómez JL, Mayo PH, Koenig SJ. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 1593-1602. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1916062.

5 

Robba C, Wong A, Poole D, et al.; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine task force for critical care ultrasonography. Basic ultra-sound head-to-toe skills for intensivists in the general and neuro intensive care unit population: consensus and expert recommendations of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47: 1347-1367. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06486-z.

6 

Flower L, Dempsey M, White A, Sanfilippo F, Olusanya O, Madhivathanan PR. Training and accreditation pathways in critical care and perioperative echocardiography. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 35: 235-247. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.046.

7 

Wong A, Galarza L, Duska F. Critical care ultrasound: a systematic review of international training competencies and program. Crit Care Med 2019; 47: e256-e262. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003626.

8 

Bodenham Chair A, Babu S, Bennett J, et al. Association of anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland: safe vascular access 2016. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 573-585. doi: 10.1111/anae.13360.

9 

Beitland S, Wimmer H, Lorentsen T, et al. Venous thromboembolism in the critically ill: A prospective observational study of occurrence, risk factors and outcome. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2019; 63: 630-638. doi: 10.1111/aas.13316.

10 

Gibson CD, Colvin MO, Park MJ, et al. Prevalence and predictors of deep vein thrombosis in critically ill medical patients who underwent diagnostic duplex ultrasonography. J Intensive Care Med 2020; 35: 1062-1066. doi: 10.1177/0885066618813300.

11 

Zhang R, Ni L, Di X, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of venous thromboembolic events in novel coronavirus disease-2019 patients. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2021; 9: 289-298.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.11.023.

12 

Rodriguez Lima DR, Yepes AF, Birchenall Jiménez CI, Mercado Díaz MA, Pinilla Rojas DI. Real-time ultrasound-guided thoracentesis in the intensive care unit: prevalence of mechanical complications. Ultrasound J 2020; 12: 25. doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00172-9.

13 

Hussain A, Via G, Melniker L, et al. Multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound for COVID-19 (PoCUS4COVID): international expert consensus. Crit Care 2020; 24: 702. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03369-5.

14 

Timsit JF, Baleine J, Bernard L, et al. Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit. Ann Intensive Care 2020; 10: 118. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00713-4.

15 

Zawadka M, Via L La, Wong A, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance as compared to landmark technique for subclavian central venous cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Crit Care Med 2023; 51: 642-652. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005819.

16 

Robba C, Goffi A, Geeraerts T, et al. Brain ultrasonography: methodo-logy, basic and advanced principles and clinical applications. A narrative review. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45: 913-927. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05610-4.

17 

Cardim D, Robba C, Bohdanowicz M, et al. Non-invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure using transcranial doppler ultrasonography: is it possible? Neurocrit Care 2016; 25: 473-491. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0258-6.

18 

Chang JJ, Tsivgoulis G, Katsanos AH, Malkoff MD, Alexandrov AV. Diagnostic accuracy of transcranial doppler for brain death confirmation: systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 408-414. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4548.

19 

Heiberg J, El-Ansary D, Royse CF, Royse AG, Alsaddique AA, Canty DJ. Transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography: a systematic review of feasibility and impact on diagnosis, management and outcome after cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 1210-1221. doi: 10.1111/anae.13545.

20 

Viarasilpa T, Panyavachiraporn N, Marashi SM, Van Harn M, Kowalski RG, Mayer SA. Prediction of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients: the ICU-Venous Thromboembolism score. Crit Care Med 2020; 48: E470-E479. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004306.

21 

Póvoa P, Martin-Loeches I, Duska F; CoBaTrICe Collaboration. Updated competency-based training in intensive care: next step towards a healthcare union in Europe? Intensive Care Med 2022; 48: 1093-1094.

22 

Wong A, Galarza L, Forni L, et al.; ESICM Critical Care Ultrasound Group. Recommendations for core critical care ultrasound competencies as a part of specialist training in multidisciplinary intensive care: a framework proposed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Crit Care 2020; 24: 393. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03099-8.

This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.