Introduction
Today, for the first time in history, most people can expect to live beyond the age of 60. The increasing life expectancy and the falling birth rate lead to rapid aging of societies all over the world (Beard et al. 2016). In this context, and in the face of increasing longevity, it is necessary to understand the processes, limitations and challenges connected with ageing, in order to create and develop initiatives aimed at supporting the wellbeing of older people. The chronological age of around 60-65 years is considered the beginning of late adulthood (Stuart-Hamilton 2012). Most people of this age experience significant psychological and physical changes which influence their everyday functioning. According to the World Health Organisation, old age begins at 60 (WHO 2001). It is a phenomenon caused by and connected with changes in the physiology, biochemistry and anatomy of body cells, influencing their functions. It is not an illness, but rather a natural process of change, which cannot be stopped or reversed. Neurons go through those changes too, which influences cognitive functioning.
The term “cognitive functions” includes a broad range of mental processes that allow people to control, adjust and coordinate their behaviour, in order to achieve goals. Both the scientific research of cognitive processes during the human lifespan and everyday observations confirm that cognitive capacity decreases with age (Nagel and Lindenberger 2015; Schmiedek et al. 2010). Older adults are less effective than younger people in many cognitive tasks, even if the groups are matched according to the level of education, and there is no evidence of neuropathology in the older participants (Logie et al. 2015). Deficits of cognitive functions result in worsened everyday functioning and are correlated with different dimensions of anxiety (Gallacher et al. 2009). Furthermore, weakened cognitive functions can be a risk factor, as well as a component supporting anxiety disorders (Sharp et al. 2015). High level of anxiety in older adults may be caused not only by weaker cognitive capacity, but also by the necessity to face many serious challenges: age-related deficits caused by diseases of the central nervous system (Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, dementia), myocardial infarctions, motor disability, cancer and many other chronic health problems which pose a challenge for both older individuals and their caregivers (Steuden 2014).
Older people often have to give up on their independence and start perceiving themselves as dependent on other people. This can be a source of anxiety and insecurity (Steuden 2014). The elderly lose their partners and/or friends, which results in a sense of isolation, frustration, anxiety and loss of hope (Heravi Karimloo et al. 2008; Steuden 2014). It is estimated that between 1.2% and 14% of older adults suffer from an anxiety disorder (Wolitzky-Taylor et al. 2010; Bryant 2008). Sub-clinical forms of anxiety disorders are even more common. It is estimated that they affect between 15% and 52.3% of the older population (Witlox et al. 2018).
Unfortunately, this age group does not receive sufficient counselling and therapy, even though sub-clinical anxiety in older adults leads to worsened quality of life and wellbeing (Witlox et al. 2018). Furthermore, even sub-clinical anxiety symptoms predispose older adults to develop a fully symptomatic mental illness (Wolitzky-Taylor et al. 2010; Bienvenu et al. 2001). Another important issue is the comorbidity of anxiety and depression (Gum and Cheavens 2008).
It is unfortunate that older people do not receive adequate care: many older persons requiring counselling or therapy do not receive help (Beard et al. 2016). This is due to the lack of access to those services (Andrade et al. 2014; Gamm et al. 2010) and limited mobility (Wetherell et al. 2004). Even if older adults do receive help, it is often limited to pharmacological treatment (Gum et al. 2010). The prevalence of full blown anxiety and depression disorders, as well as subthreshold anxiety and depression symptomatology in the older people’s everyday functioning is extensive. This means there is a pressing need to introduce evidence-based therapeutic interventions.
In the context of limited accessibility to adequate psychological care for older adults, we need to develop programmes of therapy which can be conducted with minimal contact with a therapist, or in a self-help mode. This paper proposes an intervention employing the premises of the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to support older adults. ACT combines the principles of mindfulness and acceptance with the therapeutic techniques adapted from behavioural therapy and experimental psychotherapy (Stockton et al. 2019). Psychological inflexibility is considered a factor of susceptibility to psychopathology, and a characteristic of several disorders (Kashdan 2011). In the ACT model, psychological inflexibility is considered a useful target for preventative and therapeutic interventions in many clinical aspects. The literature quotes psychological inflexibility as a susceptibility factor for depression, because it is characterised by a permanent, rigid style of reacting with rumination (Nolen-Hoeksema et al. 2008). A growing number of reports confirm that anxiety disorders are particularly connected with psychological inflexibility via a limited and stereotypical range of behavioural responses to fear and anxiety (Kashdan 2011). In the ACT model, psychological flexibility is conceptualised as the process of observing the currently occurring thoughts and emotions without unnecessary defences. It involves maintaining or changing behaviour, depending on the situation and in accordance with one’s values (Hayes et al. 2006; Stockton et al. 2019). ACT promotes the development of psychological flexibility via six core processes of change: acceptance, being present, cognitive defusion, values, self as context and committed action (Hayes et al. 2006). Acceptance is a psychological process alternative to experiential avoidance. It involves a proactive and conscious recognition of the emerging personal experiences and events (Hayes et al. 2006). In older adults, acceptance is connected with better emotional wellbeing and higher quality of life (Wetherell et al. 2011). Cognitive defusion is a process of changing the attitudes towards thoughts, which consequently reduces the thoughts’ negative effect upon the regulation of behaviour (Hayes et al. 2006; Twohig et al. 2010). Being present “promotes ongoing non-judgmental contact with psychological events and events in the environment” (Hayes et al. 2006, p. 8). The self as context process facilitates awareness of internal processes without being attached to them, and observation from some perspective. Values-based interventions strengthen the motivation to seek forms of behaviour serving those values via committed action (Hayes et al. 2006). Psychological flexibility is connected with life satisfaction, everyday wellbeing and mental health (Kashdan 2011; Wallace and Shapiro 2006). Psychological flexibility is founded on executive functioning, default mental states and personality configurations (Kashdan 2011). The neurochemical processes, anatomy and the dynamics of brain activity change during life, leading to cognitive deficiencies, particularly in fluid cognitive abilities (Nagel and Lindenberger 2015; Schmiedek et al. 2010). A significant reduction of cognitive capacity in older age is connected with the weaker functioning of the pre-frontal cortex, which plays an important role in the functioning of working memory (Nagel and Lindenberger 2015). Weakened executive functions can contribute to psychological inflexibility, which in turn may result in a rigid range of responses to fear and anxiety, and consequently in avoidant behaviour (Kashdan 2011). According to the ACT model, psychological flexibility leads to better health and wellbeing, regardless of the experienced difficulties and painful events (Kashdan 2011; Malinowski 2013). The process of conscious acceptance and an open attitude towards negative experiences may be the precursors of psychological flexibility (Kashdan 2011). Researchers have examined this phenomenon using functional neuroimaging. Research participants with less open attitudes and low acceptance displayed activation within the limbic system when they described their thoughts and emotions, both positive and negative. People with a higher level of acceptance, who described thoughts and emotions with openness and interest, showed a different pattern of activation. Heightened activity in the pre-frontal cortex was accompanied by inhibition of the limbic system (Kashdan 2011). This means that the attitude of openness and acceptance is connected with emotional regulation (executive functions – activation in the pre-frontal cortex). Other scientific evidence also indicates that acceptance and openness to experience are connected with executive functions (Kashdan 2011; Malinowski 2013), which deteriorate with age. In this context, interventions aimed at building psychological flexibility through acceptance and mindfulness are recommended for older adults. In ACT, those processes are introduced via psychoeducation, use of metaphors and exercises, as well as through experiential techniques (Twohig et al. 2010). The core ACT processes of values and committed action are consistent with the recommendations included in the definition of healthy ageing proposed by the WHO (Andrade et al. 2014), which describes it as the process of developing and preserving the functional capabilities which facilitate wellbeing in older age. Health is therefore understood not merely as the absence of illness, but it includes the functional aspect of promoting living in harmony with one’s values (Beard et al. 2017).
ACT-based interventions have been proven effective with regard to a broad range of health and psychological problems (Kishita et al. 2017; Twohig and Levin 2017; Brown et al. 2016; Lee and Song 2018; Hayes et al. 2006; Bai et al. 2020). This paper contributes to the research on the effectiveness of ACT-based training in older adults. Its objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of training in people aged 60 and over, who live in less accessible populations (small towns and villages), where older people have less access to the system of mental health care. The participants were recruited from groups at risk of social exclusion. They lived alone, suffered from chronic diseases or experienced financial difficulties. The research analyses the changes in the level of symptoms of depression and anxiety, as well as in the quality of life, measured before and after the training. It also evaluates the differences between the experimental group and the control group. In addition, the research verifies the hypothesis about a moderating role of cognitive functioning, as measured by the Mini Mental State Examination scale, in achieving the above changes.
Material and methods
The research project was approved by the Ethics Committee for Scientific Research of the Faculty of Psychology at SWPS University. The research and training of volunteers lasted from July until October 2020.
Participants
Sixty out of 64 volunteers completed the questionnaires and, where appropriate, the training procedures (4 volunteers did not fulfil the criteria of age – above 60 – or of not having participated in psychotherapy during the preceding year). The participants were aged between 60 and 91 (M = 73.48, SD = 8.87). Forty-two were female and 18 were male. 91.7% of participants were retired. Twenty-five participants had a primary level of education (7 or 8 years), 19 had vocational training, 15 had secondary qualifications and one had a university degree. All participants lived in villages or small towns. Their level of cognitive functioning measured with the MMSE scale did not significantly differ between groups [F(1,58) = 0.35, p = 0.56]. The mean for the control group was 27.10 (SD = 2.91), and for the experimental group 27.50 (SD = 2.30). Fifteen participants had the MMSE result below 27, of whom 3 had vocational training, and the remaining ones completed primary education. Three of those people were aged below 80 years. They were informed about the availability of neurological consultation concerning possible dementia.
Procedure
The volunteers were recruited directly by the researcher in their daytime locations. Everybody was extensively informed about the research and the principles of personal data protection, and they signed a consent form. They were randomly assigned to research groups (random.org). The experimental group (N = 30) participated in training involving the ACT protocol (4 weeks of training 3-4 times a week, a total of 12 sessions). The control group (N = 30) was passive. The participants from both groups filled in a personal data form and then questionnaire tests. The training sessions took place in groups. People who were absent from a group session were trained individually, so that all the participants went through an identical training programme. The intervention was conducted by a psychologist trained in ACT therapy. After the training programme, i.e. after about 4 weeks, participants from both groups once again completed the same questionnaire tests.
Research methods
In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the training, participants in both the experimental and the control group completed the following tests:
The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is a clinical scale measuring cognitive impairment (Pangman et al. 2000). The questionnaire comprises 30 questions/tasks allowing for quantitative evaluation of different aspects of cognitive functioning. The results are sensitive to age, level of education and cultural background, but not to gender (Tombaugh and McIntyre 1992). In this research the MMSE is used as the control variable describing the level of participants’ cognitive functioning.
The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (short version, DASS-21) contains 21 statements (Lovibond and Lovibond 1995). The scale is based on the dimensional approach to mental disorders, which defines psychopathological symptoms as present in non-clinical populations, albeit in a milder form. Affective symptoms, such as depression or anxiety, differ in intensity along a continuum, regardless of the specific diagnosis. This is why DASS-21 allows for an effective diagnosis of symptoms, particularly among people suffering from sub-clinical manifestations of a particular disorder. The scale is used for self-evaluation of the symptoms of anxiety, depression and stress, using three seven-item sub-scales. The authors list dysphoria, hopelessness, devaluation of life, self-deprecation, lack of interest/involvement, anhedonia and inertia as the symptoms of depression. They list physiological arousal as the main symptom of anxiety.
WHO Quality of Life – AGE scale (WHOQOL-AGE) is a tool for measuring quality of life with a particular focus on the aspects related to older adults. Polish validation (Zawisza et al. 2016) shows the measurement to be valid, reliable and suitable for use in Poland in older populations.
Training programme
The participants in the experimental group underwent a 12-module original programme entitled Arte Vitae, which was based on the premises of ACT therapy and designed on the basis of scientific literature (Hayes and Smith 2019; Harris 2019; Forsyth and Eifert 2016). The intervention protocol is presented in a separate paper (Chojak and Papińska 2020). Each programme module (20-40 minutes) included elements of psychoeducation, breathing exercises, listening to a recording, and a written exercise. The contents of the Arte Vitae programme is related to building psychological competences, based on the core ACT processes.
Results
The statistical analyses were done using the IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 programme. The first step included the calculation of the basic descriptive statistics, which are presented in Tables 1 and 2.
The differences in the level of psychopathological symptoms for the initial and the final measurement, and between the experimental and the control group, were established using a 2 × 2 analysis of variance (2 groups × 2 measurements). For the purpose of the analyses we assumed the significance level α = 0.05. Training was the inter-object factor, whereas the intra-group factors were the measurements of the quality of life and psychopathological symptoms at the beginning of the research and after a month. The analyses were conducted for the results of WHOQOL-AGE and the depression and anxiety sub-scales of DASS-21. The detailed results of those analyses are reported in the further part of this article.
Symptoms of depression
The analysis did not show a significant main effect for the measurement, F(1,58) = 3.37, p = 0.072, ηp2 = 0.06. The symptoms of depression after a month (M = 4.10, SE = 0.44) were not significantly different from the initial ones (M = 4.78, SE = 0.47). Also the main effect for the inter-object factor, the training, proved insignificant, F(1,58) = 2.79, p = 0.100, ηp2 = 0.05. People from the group participating in the training (M = 3.75, SE = 0.59) were not significantly different from the people in the control group (M = 5.13, SE = 0.59) as far as depressive symptoms were concerned.
Furthermore, there was no significant interaction of both factors, F(1,58) = 1.68, p = 0.200, ηp2 = 0.03. The analysis of simple effects for training showed significant differences between the groups for depressive symptoms after a month, F(1,58) = 4.54, p = 0.037, ηp2 = 0.07. People in the experimental group displayed a significantly lower level of depressive symptoms than people in the control group. The differences between groups in the initial measurement were insignificant, F(1,58) = 0.92, p = 0.342, ηp2 = 0.02. The analysis of the simple effect for the measurement did not show significant differences in the level of depressive symptoms in the control group F(1,58) = 0.14, p = 0.706, ηp2 < 0.01, whereas in the experimental group the difference was significant, F(1,58) = 4.90, p = 0.031, ηp2 = 0.08. After a month of training, the level of depressive symptoms in this group decreased significantly. The means and standard deviations for the analysed effect are presented in Figure 1.
Symptoms of anxiety
The analysis found a significant main effect for the measurement, F(1,58) = 5.08, p = 0.028, ηp2 = 0.08. The level of anxiety symptoms showed in the initial measurement (M = 4.82, SE = 0.48) was significantly higher than that for the measurement one month later (M = 3.98, SE = 0.41). Also significant was the main effect for the inter-object factor – training, F(1,58) = 4.49, p = 0.038, ηp2 = 0.07. People in the experimental group (M = 3.53, SE = 0.58) showed a lower level of anxiety symptoms than the people in the control group (M = 5.27, SE = 0.58). Also significant was the interaction of both factors, F(1,58) = 5.93, p = 0.018, ηp2 = 0.09. The analysis of simple effects for training did not show statistically significant differences between groups during the first measurement, F(1,58) = 0.74, p = 0.392, ηp2 = 0.01. It did find significant differences for the measurement carried out one month later, F(1,58) = 10.24, p = 0.002, ηp2 = 0.15. People from the training group showed a lower level of anxiety symptoms than the people in the control group. The analysis of simple effects for the measurement did not show significant differences in the level of anxiety symptoms among the participants from the control group, F(1,58) = 0.02, p = 0.899, ηp2 < 0.01, whereas the difference between measurements was significant for the experimental group (participating in the therapy), F(1,58) = 10.99, p = 0.002, ηp2 = 0.16. After a month of training, the level of anxiety symptoms in the group was significantly reduced. The means and standard deviations for the analysed effect are presented in Figure 2.
Quality of life
The analysis showed a significant main effect for the measurement, F(1,58) = 12.53, p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.18. The level of quality of life measured after a month (M = 48.25, SE = 0.95) was significantly higher than in the initial measurement (M = 46.20, SE = 0.98). Also the main effect for the inter-object factor, training, proved significant, F(1,58) = 4.43, p = 0.040, ηp2 = 0.07. People in the control group (M = 45.28, SE = 1.30) showed a lower level of quality of life than people in the experimental group (M = 49.17, SE = 1.30). The interaction of both factors was significant as well, F(1,58) = 33.45, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.37. The analysis of simple effects for training did not show significant differences in the initial level of quality of life between people from the control and the experimental group, F(1,58) = 0.07, p = 0.787, ηp2 < 0.01. It did show significant differences for the measurement carried out one month later, F(1,58) = 14.50, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.20. The quality of life of people in the experimental group was significantly higher than that of people from the control group. The analysis of simple effects for the measurement did not show significant differences for the control group, F(1,58) = 2.52, p = 0.118, ηp2 = 0.04, whereas there was a significant difference between the measurements in the experimental group, F(1,58) = 43.46, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.43. After a month of training, the level of quality of life in this group increased significantly. The means and standard deviations for the analysed effect are presented in Figure 3.
The level of cognitive functioning measured by the MMSE scale as a moderator of the relationship between the first and the second measurement of the symptoms of depression and anxiety
In the next step, we tested moderation models, using the PROCESS macro by A. Hayes (model 1), in which the moderator was the level of cognitive functioning measured by the MMSE, the independent variable was the first measurement of anxiety and depression, and the dependent variable was the second measurement of those symptoms. The variables were subjected to centration. Cognitive functioning was divided into three levels, low, average and high, on the basis of the mean level ± 1 SD. The analysis showed that the level of cognitive functioning measured by MMSE was not a significant moderator of the relationship between the first and the second measurement of DASS-21 dimensions. The aggregate results of the analyses are presented in Table 3.
The level of cognitive functioning measured by the MMSE scale as a moderator of the relationship between the first and the second measurement of quality of life
The last analysed model concerned establishing the significance of cognitive functioning measured with the MMSE as a moderator for the relationship between the first and the second measurement of the quality of life. The analysis did not show a significant moderation effect for the level of cognitive functioning. The interaction between this level and the first measurement of the quality of life was insignificant. The detailed results of the analyses for the model are presented in Table 4.
Discussion
The results of statistical analyses confirmed the hypothesis about the effectiveness of ACT-based training of psychological competences in lowering the symptoms of psychopathology and improving the quality of life. The initial level of symptoms of depression and symptoms of anxiety showed no significant differences between the experimental and the control group. Significant differences occurred after a month. Both the depressive and the anxiety symptoms decreased significantly between measurements, but only for the people in the experimental group. The difference between the groups was significant. A similar effect was observed for the quality of life. Initially there was no significant difference between the groups. The second measurement showed better quality of life only in the experimental group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant. The hypothesis about the moderating role of the level of cognitive functioning measured with the MMSE scale in the change of psychopathological symptoms, depression and anxiety, and the change in the quality of life was not confirmed.
Conclusions
The number and proportion of people aged over 60 is constantly increasing. In 2019, there were a billion people of that age. By 2050, the number may exceed two billion (WHO 2020).
Older age brings new challenges and difficulties. The stress related to ageing changes people’s priorities in life. Physical wellbeing, psychological health, sense of security and the need to stay active and stimulated come to the forefront (Steuden 2014). This is why older adults need comprehensive support to enjoy a healthy and fulfilling life for as long as possible. ACT-based interventions have the potential to support older adults in improving their wellbeing in spite of the many age-related challenges. This paper contributes to the research confirming the effectiveness of ACT-based interventions for older people. The analyses showed that cognitive functioning measured with the MMSE did not play a moderating role for the relationship between the first and the second measurements of psychopathology (depression and anxiety) and quality of life. This means that ACT-based training may be effective regardless of the participants’ level of cognitive functioning. Consequently, this type of intervention can be recommended for use in care homes, day centres and other institutions looking after the wellbeing of older people, including for patients with initial symptoms of cognitive impairment. An intervention in the form of a self-help book or a mobile application could deliver support to people in danger of social exclusion who live far from the centres of psychological support. Even though almost a half of participants (48.3%) had MMSE results lower than 28, it is important to remember that 41.7% of them had only primary education. Older participants stated that they had discontinued their education not due to a lack of talent or desire, but because of financial hardship suffered by their families in rural areas after the war. Consequently, MMSE results below or equal to 27 may not indicate cognitive impairment processes when we control for age cohort and education. The results may be clinically applicable. ACT-based programmes can be conducted for older adults at risk of social exclusion or suffering from a higher level of psychopathological symptoms. The English National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE 2009) recommends that mild forms of therapy should last for 12-16 weeks. It is recommended for the results to be replicated in further research on older adults, which will involve longer duration of therapeutic intervention, in order to achieve lasting improvement of participants’ wellbeing and quality of life.
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Andrade LH, Alonso J, Mneimneh Z, et al. Barriers to mental health treatment: Results from the WHO world mental health (WMH) surveys. Psychol Med 2014; 44: 1303-1317.
2.
Bai Z, Luo S, Zhang L, et al. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to reduce depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Dis 2020; 260: 728-737.
3.
Beard J, Officer A, De Carvalho I. The World report on ageing and health: A policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet 2016; 387: 2145-2154.
4.
Beard JR, De Carvalho AI, Sumi Y, et al. Healthy ageing: moving forward. Bull World Health Organ 2017; 95: 730.
5.
Bienvenu OJ, Brown C, Samuels JF, et al. Normal personality traits and comorbidity among phobic, panic, and major depressive disorders. Psychiatry Res 2001; 102: 73-85.
6.
Brown M, Glendenning A, Hoon AE, et al. Effectiveness of web-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy in relation to mental health and well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18: e221.
7.
Bryant C, Jackson H, Ames D. The prevalence of anxiety in older adults: methodological issues and a review of the literature. J Affect Disord 2008; 109: 233-250.
8.
Chojak A, Papinska A. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy-based intervention in therapy for mental health disorders – case study. Adv Psychiatry Neurol 2020; 29: 250-258.
9.
Forsyth J, Eifert G. The Mindfulness and Acceptance Workbook for Anxiety. New Harbinger Publications, Oakland 2016.
10.
Gallacher J, Bayer A, Fish M, et al. Does anxiety affect risk of dementia? Findings from the Caerphilly prospective study. Psychosom Med 2009; 71: 659-666.
11.
Gamm L, Stone S, Pittman S. Mental health and mental disorders – a rural challenge: a literature review. Rural Healthy People 2010; 2: 97-113.
12.
Gum AM, Cheavens JS. Psychiatric comorbidity and depression in older adults. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2008; 10: 23-29.
13.
Gum AM, Iser L, Petkus AJ. Behavioral health service utilization and preferences of older adults receiving home-based aging services. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 18: 491-501.
14.
Harris R. Zrozumieć ACT. Terapia akceptacji i zaangażowania w praktyce. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Sopot 2019.
15.
Hayes S, Smith S. W pułapce myśli. Jak skutecznie poradzić sobie z depresją, stresem i lękiem. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Sopot 2019.
16.
Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther 2006; 44: 1-25.
17.
Health/Aging. World Health Organization [Online]. Available at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/ageing#tab=tab_1. (accessed 5 February 2021).
18.
Heravi Karimloo M, Anoosheh M, Foroughan M, et al. Loneliness from the perspectives of elderly people: a phenomenological study. Iran J Ageing 2008; 2: 410-420.
19.
Kashdan TB. Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clin Psychol Rev 2011; 30: 865-878.
20.
Kishita N, Takei Y, Stewart I. A meta-analysis of third wave mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral therapies for older people. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2017; 32: 1352-1361.
21.
Lee EK, Song MK. Effectiveness of ACT-based group counseling for depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Korean J Couns Psychother 2018; 30: 635-661.
22.
Logie R, Horne MR, Pettit LD. When cognitive performance does not decline across the lifespan. W: Working Memory and Ageing. Logie R, Morris R (Eds.). Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York 2015.
23.
Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety & Stress Scales. Psychology Foundation, Sydney 1995.
24.
Malinowski P. Neural mechanisms of attentional control in mindfulness meditation. Front Neurosci 2013; 7: 8.
25.
Nagel IE, Lindenberger U. Adult age differences in working memory: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. In: Working Memory and Ageing. Logie RH, Morris RG (Eds.). Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York 2015.
26.
NICE (2009) [Online]. Available at: https://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/depression#path=view%3A/pathways/depression/step-2-recognised-depression-in-adults-persistent-subthreshold-depressive-symptoms-or-mild-to-moderate-depression.xml&content=view-node%3Anodes-low-intensity-interventions-or-group-cbt (accessed 6 May 2021).
27.
Nolen-Hoeksema S, Wisco BE, Lyubomirsky S. Rethinking rumination. Perspect Psychol Sci 2008; 3: 400-424.
28.
Ochsner KN, Gross JJ. Cognitive emotion regulation: Insights from social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2008; 17: 153-158.
29.
Pangman V, Sloan J, Guse L. An examination of psychometric properties of the Mini-Mental Status Examination and the Standardized Mini-Mental Status Examination: implications for clinical practice. Appl Nurs Res 2000; 13: 209-213.
30.
Schmiedek F, Bauer C, Lovden M, et al. Technology in healthy aging. Cognitive enrichment in old age. Web-based training programs. Front Aging Neurosci 2010; 27: 9-67.
31.
Sharp PB, Miller GA, Heller W. Transdiagnostic dimensions of anxiety: Neural mechanisms, executive functions, and new directions. Int J Psychophysiol 2015; 98: 365-377.
32.
Steuden S. Psychologia starzenia się i starości. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2014.
33.
Stockton D, Kellett S, Berrios R, et al. Identifying the underlying mechanisms of change during acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT): A systematic review of contemporary mediation studies. Behav Cogn Psychother 2019; 47: 332-362.
34.
Stuart-Hamilton I. The psychology of ageing. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London and Philadelphia 2012.
35.
Tombaugh T, McIntyre N. The Mini‐Mental State Examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 922-935.
36.
Twohig MP, Levin ME. Acceptance and commitment therapy as a treatment for anxiety and depression: A review. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2017; 40: 751-770.
37.
Twohig MP, Masuda A, Varra AA, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy as a treatment for anxiety disorders. In: Acceptance and Mindfulness-Based Approaches to Anxiety. Orsillo SM, Roemer L (Eds.). Springer, New York 2010.
38.
Wallace BA, Shapiro S. Mental balance and well-being: building bridges between Buddhism and Western Psychology. Am Psychol 2006; 61: 690-701.
39.
Wetherell JL, Ayers CR, Stoddard JA, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy for generalized anxiety disorder in older adults: a preliminary report. Behav Ther 2011; 42: 127-134.
40.
Wetherell JL, Kaplan RM, Kallenberg G, et al. Mental health treatment preferences of older and younger primary care patients. Int J Psychiatry Med 2004; 34: 219-233.
41.
Witlox M, Kraaij V, Garnefski N, et al. An Internet-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention for older adults with anxiety complaints: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018; 19: 1-14.
42.
Wolitzky-Taylor KB, Castriotta N, Lenze EJ et al., Anxiety disorders in older adults: a comprehensive review. Depress Anxiety 2010; 27(2):190–211.
43.
World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization [Online]. Available at: https://www.who.int/ageing/events/world-report-2015-launch/en/. (accessed 5 February 2021).
44.
Zawisza K, Gałaś A, Tobiasz-Adamczyk B. Walidacja polskiej wersji skali oceny jakości życia WHOQOL-AGE. Gerontol Pol 2016; 1: 7-16.