1. Kirisits C, Rivard MJ, Baltas D et al. Review of clinical brachytherapy uncertainties: Analysis guidelines of GEC-ESTRO and the AAPM. Radiother Oncol 2014; 110: 199-212.
2.
Strnad V, Ott OJ, Hildebrandt G et al. 5-year results of accelerated partial breast irradiation using sole interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy versus whole-breast irradiation with boost after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk invasive and in-situ carcinoma of the female breast: a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 229-238.
3.
Strnad V, Kovács G, Block T. Practical handbook of brachytherapy. UNI-MED Verl., Bremen 2014.
4.
van Dijk E, Kolkman-Deurloo IK, Damen PM. Determination of the reference air kerma rate for 192Ir brachytherapy sources and the related uncertainty. Med Phys 2004; 31: 2826-2833.
5.
Kallis K, Kaltsas T, Kreppner S et al. Impact of inter- and intra-observer variabilities of catheter reconstruction on multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy of breast cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 2019; 135: 25-32.
6.
Dürrbeck C, Gulde S, Abu-Hossin N et al. Influence and compensation of patient motion in electromagnetic tracking based quality assurance in interstitial brachytherapy of the breast. Med Phys 2022; 49: 2652-2662.
7.
Kallis K, Abu-Hossin N, Kreppner S et al. Estimation of inter-fractional variations in interstitial multi-catheter breast brachytherapy using a hybrid treatment delivery system. Radiother Oncol 2019; 141: 312-320.
8.
Kallis K, Kreppner S, Lotter M et al. Introduction of a hybrid treatment delivery system used for quality assurance in multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63: 095008.
9.
Kallis K, Ziegler M, Lotter M et al. Is adaptive treatment planning in multi-catheter interstitial breast brachytherapy necessary? Radiother Oncol 2019; 141: 304-311.
10.
Kellermeier M, Fietkau R, Strnad V, Bert C. Assessment of the implant geometry in fractionated interstitial HDR breast brachytherapy using an electromagnetic tracking system. Brachytherapy 2018; 17: 94-102.
11.
Kellermeier M, Herbolzheimer J, Kreppner S, et al. Electromagnetic tracking (EMT) technology for improved treatment quality assurance in interstitial brachytherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18: 211-222.
12.
Masitho S, Kallis K, Strnad V et al. Error detection using an electromagnetic tracking system in multi-catheter breast interstitial brachytherapy. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64: 205018.
13.
Dürrbeck C, Schuster S, Sauer BC et al. Localization of reference points in electromagnetic tracking data and their application for treatment error detection in interstitial breast brachytherapy. Med Phys 2023; 50: 5772-5783.
14.
Gómez Sarmiento I, Tho D, Dürrbeck C et al. Image registration of an electromagnetic tracking enabled afterloader and CT using a phantom for the quality control of implant reconstruction. 2023.
15.
Gómez Sarmiento I, Tho D, Dürrbeck C et al. Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking enabled afterloader based on the automated registration with CT phantom images. Med Phys 2024; 51: 799-808.
16.
Bert C, Kellermeier M, Tanderup K. Electromagnetic tracking for treatment verification in interstitial brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2016; 8: 448-453.
17.
Franz AM, Haidegger T, Birkfellner W et al. Electromagne- tic tracking in medicine – a review of technology, validation, and applications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2014; 33: 1702- 1725.
18.
Sauer BC, Dürrbeck C, Bert C. Electromagnetic tracking in interstitial brachytherapy: A systematic review. Front Phys Mini Rev 2022; 10; doi: 10.3389/fphy.2022.956983.
19.
Sorriento A, Porfido MB, Mazzoleni S et al. Optical and electromagnetic tracking systems for biomedical applications: A critical review on potentialities and limitations. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2020; 13: 212-232.
20.
Damato AL, Viswanathan AN, Don SM et al. A system to use electromagnetic tracking for the quality assurance of brachytherapy catheter digitization. Med Phys 2014; 41: 101702.
21.
Tho D, Lavallée MC, Beaulieu L. Performance of an enhanced afterloader with electromagnetic tracking capabilities for channel reconstruction and error detection. Med Phys 2021; 48: 4402-4410.
22.
van Heerden L, Schiphof-Godart J, Christianen M et al. Accuracy of dwell position detection with a combined electromagnetic tracking brachytherapy system for treatment verification in pelvic brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2020; 154: 249-254.
23.
Dürrbeck C, Sauer BC, Lotter M et al. Automating implant reconstruction in interstitial brachytherapy of the breast: A hybrid approach combining electromagnetic tracking and image segmentation. Radiother Oncol 2022; 176: 172-178.
24.
Brock KK, Mutic S, McNutt TR et al. Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 132. Med Phys 2017; 44: e43-e76.
25.
Procrustes. [Online]. Available: https://de.mathworks.com/help/stats/procrustes.html
26.
Absolute Orientation – Horn’s method (2022). [Online]. Available: https://de.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/26186-absolute-orientation-horn-s-method
27.
pcregistericp. [Online]. Available: https://de.mathworks.com/help/vision/ref/pcregistericp.html
28.
Myronenko A, Song X. Point set registration: Coherent point drift. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2010; 32: 2262-2275.
29.
Strnad V, Major T, Polgar C et al. ESTRO-ACROP guideline: Interstitial multi-catheter breast brachytherapy as Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation alone or as boost – GEC-ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group practical recommendations. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128: 411-420.
30.
Marzola A, Robilotta C, Volpe Y et al. Statistical Shape Model: comparison between ICP and CPD algorithms on medical applications. Int J Interactive Design Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 2021; 15: 85-89.
31.
Masitho S, Putz F, Mengling V et al. Accuracy of MRI-CT registration in brain stereotactic radiotherapy: Impact of MRI acquisition setup and registration method. Z Med Phys 2022; 32: 477-487.
32.
Cutter JR, Styles IB, Leonardis A, Dehghani H. Image-based registration for a neurosurgical robot: comparison using iterative closest point and coherent point drift algorithms. Proc Comp Sci 2016; 90: 28-34.
33.
Grajales D, Kadoury S, Shams R et al. Performance of an integrated multimodality image guidance and dose-planning system supporting tumor-targeted HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 166: 154-161.
34.
Koprivec D, Rosenfeld A, Cutajar D et al. Feasibility of online adaptive HDR prostate brachytherapy: A novel treatment concept. Brachytherapy 2022; 21: 943-955.
35.
Nunez DA, Trager M, Beaudry J et al. Quantifying clinical severity of physics errors in high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy using simulations. Brachytherapy 2021; 20: 1062-1069.
36.
Poder J, Carrara M, Howie A et al. Derivation of in vivo source tracking error thresholds for TRUS-based HDR prostate brachytherapy through simulation of source positioning errors. Brachytherapy 2019; 18: 711-719.
37.
Poder J, Koprivec D, Dookie Y et al. HDR prostate brachytherapy plan robustness and its effect on in-vivo source tracking error thresholds: A multi-institutional study. Med Phys 2022; 49: 3529-3537.
38.
Lim YK, Kim D. Brachytherapy: A comprehensive review. Prog Med Phys 2021; 32: 25-39.
