eISSN: 1897-4309
ISSN: 1428-2526
Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Addendum Special Issues Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2019
vol. 23
 
Share:
Share:
Case report

Graft-versus-host disease in a child with neuroblastoma after autologous stem cell transplantation

Yöntem Yaman
1
,
Gökhan Baysoy
2
,
Emre Keleşoğlu
3
,
Kürşat Özdilli
1
,
Aslı Çakır
4
,
Dildar Bahar Genç
5
,
Murat Elli
1
,
Sema Anak
1

  1. Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
  2. Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
  3. Department of Pediatrics, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
  4. Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
  5. Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Şişli Etfal Hamidiye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2019; 23 (1): 59-62
Online publish date: 2019/03/25
Article file
- Graft.pdf  [0.13 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is potentially curative for several malignancies. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an immunologically mediated process, involving donor T cell responses to host alloantigens and the dysregulation of inflammatory cytokine cascade after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) [13]. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is less common compared to patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Due to the obvious lack of genetic disparity between donor and recipient, the existence of autologous GVHD (AGVHD) has been a topic of controversy [25]. But beyond the technical inaccuracy of the terminology, it is a well-known disease that can affect the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and liver.

We present the case of a 4-year-old girl with metastatic neuroblastoma who spontaneously developed AGVHD after autologous HSCT. An accurate diagnosis can minimize unnecessary hospitalizations and repeat diagnostic tests. Prompt treatment can improve morbidity and prevent disease progression.

Case report

A 4-year-old girl with neuroblastoma stage 4 first received 6 courses of chemotherapy and surgery according to the Turkish Pediatric Oncology Group (TPOG) Neuroblastoma 2009 protocol. Chemotherapy treatment consisted of three courses of chemotherapy containing vincristine, dacarbazine, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin, and three other courses that contained cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and etoposide. She was randomized to a high risk stem cell transplantation group with a small remnant of neuroblastoma (partial response).

She was then treated with autologous HSCT. Melphalan (140 mg/m2) and busulfan (intravenous busulfan – IVBU) 1.1 mg/kg were used for the first dose; thereafter, the IVBU dose was modified to achieve a final area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) at steady state of 1150 μmol/l/min per dose followed by stem cell support in a cell dose of 5.7 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Fluconazole was given from conditioning therapy until day 75 after stem cell infusion. She also received prophylactic low-dose acyclovir. She had weekly cytomegalovirus (CMV) screening with a CMV pp65 antigenemia assay. Engraftment of neutrophils and platelets took place on day +11 and +14 respectively after autologous HSCT. At post-engraftment day +20 intermittent nausea and diarrhea started. Vital signs were normal except mild tachycardia. Physical examination was normal except dry oral mucosa and hyperactive bowel sound. There were no skin lesions. The blood biochemistry tests were within the normal range. Elevation of hepatic enzymes was not detected. The diarrhea worsened, color changed to green and reached a daily volume up to 1500 ml/m2 during the next three days. Albumin and immunoglobulin G decreased to 2.3 g/dl and 322 mg/dl respectively. Intravenous immunoglobulin and albumin were replaced intravenously.

Infectious studies of stool and blood including influenza A and B, parainfluenza, adenovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, amebiasis, Cryptosporidium parvum, cytomegalovirus, Clostridium difficile, Salmonella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, and Shigella were all found negative.

Fecal calprotectin was high at 822 mg/dl (n: 0–120). The diarrhea lasted longer and the amount increased. The contrasted computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis revealed diffusely thickened walls of small bowel and colon suggestive of diffuse enterocolitis. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was started because of difficulty in tolerating enteral feeding. After radiological evidence of gastrointestinal system involvement and persistent worsening of clinical symptoms colonoscopy and rectoscopy were performed by an experienced pediatric gastroenterologist at the 34th day of autologous HSCT and endoscopic images were found suspicious for severe GVHD. Colonoscopy and rectoscopy revealed severe inflammatory changes, friability and patchy dark exudates on the mucosa of the rectum. Endoscopy revealed erosions, ulcers in the esophagus and a pale mucosal surface with reticulated submucosal vessels accompanied by erosion and erythema in the antrum of the stomach (Fig. 1). Diffuse crypt dropout and mucosal erosion on rectal mucosal biopsy that is consistent with grade III GVHD was confirmed by pathologists (Figs. 2A and 2B). Mucosal erosions, apoptosis of epithelial cells and small lymphocytic infiltration of the lamina propria that is consistent with grade II GVHD were found on duodenal biopsy (Figs. 2C and 2D). Immunostaining for cytomegalovirus was negative. There was no evidence of pathologic surface organisms, fungi or viral inclusions on microscopic examination.

Fig. 1

A) Erosions and edema in antrum of stomach. B) Erythema in antrum of stomach

/f/fulltexts/WO/36132/WO-23-83815-g001_min.jpg
Fig. 2

A) Esophagus 10× mucosal erosions, lymphocytic infiltration of lamina propria. B) Colon 10×, loss of crypt. C) Colon 10×, loss of crypts and apoptosis. D) Colon 20×, apoptosis

/f/fulltexts/WO/36132/WO-23-83815-g002_min.jpg

After these results, we started methylprednisolone intravenously at a dosage of 2 mg/kg/day for GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract. Because of unresponsiveness to treatment on the fourth day of treatment we increased the dosage to 5 mg/kg/day and added cyclosporine and budesonide to the treatment. The patient needed prolongation of TPN. Because of an inadequate response to treatment, we decided to administer third-party mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) (1 × 106 CD73+/CD105+ cells/kg). These were given intravenously at day +49 of HSCT as first infusion. The second dose was given at the same dosage on day +56. Within 5 days after first application of MSC, the frequency of diarrhea decreased to one third. At day +16 after the second dose of MSC, the patient’s stool became nearly normal. We changed methylprednisolone to oral prednisolone; prednisolone was tapered gradually and stopped over a period of 75 days. We stopped cyclosporine at day +92 after HSCT. Budesonide was stopped at day +110 HSCT. Over the following 12 months there was no recurrence of symptoms.

To our knowledge, this is the second case report of spontaneous severe autologous GVHD in a child with a solid tumor [2] and this is the first case report of severe autologous gastrointestinal GVHD in a child in the literature.

Discussion

Graft-versus-host disease is a common complication of allo-SCT which is induced by donor T cell recognition of recipient alloantigens [6]. GVHD after autologous HSCT or transplantation from a genetically identical twin may cause clinical and histopathologic findings consistent with GVHD [1]. Some investigator propose that all forms of AGVHD (i.e., cutaneous, GI, and liver) be included under the umbrella term “engraftment syndrome” [5]. Beyond the nomenclature AGVHD is an under-diagnosed complication of autologous HSCT resembling GVHD occurring after allogeneic HSCT [1]. There are several hypotheses to explain the pathogenesis of AGVHD. The development of GVHD-like syndrome after autologous HSCT is associated with baseline immune dysregulation as reported in the allogeneic GVHD model. If appropriate treatment is not initiated the prognosis may be poor [7]. The pathogenesis is attributed to the failure in self-tolerance. Alteration of T regulatory cells by previous chemotherapy may be the key point. Endogenous cells that survive conditioning and assist in post-transplant maintenance of self-tolerance may be affected [2]. Microchimerism due to maternal cells transmitted during fetal development and persisting throughout adult life has also been postulated as another cause. However, it is not very clear which factors might contribute to the pathogenesis of this rare disease.

Skin involvement is the most common involvement site of AGVHD. But all other systems can be affected. Althouh Adams et al. reported acute GVHD in 18% of recipients of genetically identical twin transplants [8], there has been estimated a 4–15% incidence of GVHD after autologous HSCT in adults. Among multiple myeloma patients, the incidence is slightly higher and can be as high as 5–20% [36]. Skin AGVHD is reported with an 8% incidence by Hood et al. for patients who received autologous and syngeneic transplantation. Patients’ rashes were typically self-limited, but some needed treatment with steroids. Gastrointestinal GVHD incidence was reported to be 13% among autologous stem cell transplantation patients by Holmberg et al. In their study they found AGVHD as a limited disease; a majority of their patients resolve spontaneously and often require no treatment [9]. In patients with multiple myeloma some experts report pathologically verified gastrointestinal GVHD as high as 6% [3]. Responses to steroids are generally good but can be variable. A significant proportion improve dramatically after early therapeutic intervention. So clinicians and pathologists should be aware in suspecting and recognizing GVHD in patients with diarrhea to guide therapy as soon as possible. However, Drobyski et al. reported five cases refractory to corticosteroids and treated with different medications. Four of them died because of AGVHD-related problems [3]. GVHD must be considered when making the differential diagnosis of skin lesions and diarrhea syndromes that occur even in the autologous posttransplantation period.

In treatment of AGVHD, immunosuppression using steroids remains the first line of intervention. Several novel therapeutic options are being investigated for treatment of steroid-refractory AGVHD including the use of mesenchymal stem cells, anti-thymocyte globulin and extracorporeal photophoresis. Third party MSC can support hematopoietic cells and also have immunomodulatory functions. They can directly inhibit proliferation of T cells introduced by alloantigens. It has been shown that MSC can suppress lymphocyte alloreactivity in mixed lymphocyte cultures (MLC) [10, 11]. Ex vivo expansion and infusion of MSC have been demonstrated to be safe for therapeutic use with no acute toxicity. Due to low immunogenicity and immunomodulatory effects, MSC have been used in an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation setting [12]. MSC are safe to use. MSC therapy seems to be more efficient in the treatment of gastrointestinal and liver acute GVHD [13].

Conclusions

To our knowledge this report is the second report of spontaneous severe AGVHD and first report of autologous gastrointestinal GVHD in a child with a solid tumor malignancy. Even after an extensive search of the PubMed literature, we could not find any report about the use of MSC in AGVHD. We think that in severe cases of AGVHD, MSC may be an alternative treatment option. In conclusion, this report aims to increase awareness of this rare complication in children and to give an idea about different treatment options.

Notes

[1] Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

El-Jurdi, Ueda M, Jia L, Lazarus H , authors. Late occurrrence of autologous GvHD in a myeloma patient: a myth or diagnostic challange? Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017. 52:p. 910–912

2 

Kaffenberger J, Basak SA, Ioffreda M , authors. Autologous Graft versus Host Disease in a child with stage IV neuroblastoma. Pediatr Dermatol. 2015. 32:p. 276–279

3 

Drobyski WR, Hari P, Keever Taylor C, Komorowski R, Grossman W , authors. Severe autologous GVHD after hematopoetic progenitor cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009. 43:p. 169–177

4 

Hammami MB, Talkin R , authors. Autologous graft versus host disease of the gastrointestinal tract in patients with multiple myeloma and hematopoetic stem cell transplantation. Gastroenterol Res. 2018. 11:p. 52–57

5 

Cornell RF, Hari P, Drobyski WR , authors. Engrafment syndrome after autologous stem cell transplantation: an update unifying the definition and management approach. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015. 21:p. 2061–2068

6 

Lee SE, Yoon JH, Shin SH, Park G, Min CK , authors. Skin graft versus host disease following autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Immune Network. 2013. 13:p. 107–110

7 

Anagnostou T, Patnaik MM, Forsman CL, et al. , authors. Immune dysregulation in autologous stem cell transplant recipients is associated with a “graft versus host”-like syndrome and results in poor outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018. 24:p. 121–122

8 

Adams KM, Holmberg LA, Leisenring W, et al. , authors. Risk factors for syngeneic graft versus host disease after adult hematopoetic cell transplantation. Blood. 2004. 104:p. 1894–1897

9 

Hood AF, Vogelsang GB, Black LP, Farmer ER, Santos GW , authors. Acute graft vs host disease: development following autologous and syngeneic bone marrow transplantation. Arch Dermatol. 1987. 123:p. 745–750

10 

Marigo IDF , author. The immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stem cells. Semin Immunopathol. 2011. 33:p. 593–602

11 

Le Blanc K, Tammik L, Sundberg B, Haynesworth SE, Ringdén O , authors. Mesanchymal stem cells inhibit and stimulate mixed lymphocyte cultures and mitogenic responses independently of major histocompatibility complex. Scand J Immunol. 2003. 57:p. 11–20

12 

Lazarus HM, Haynesworth SE, Gerson SL, Rosenthal NS, Caplan AI , authors. Ex vivo expansion and subsequent infusion of human bone marrow derived stromal progenitor cells:implications for therapeutic use. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995. 16:p. 557–564

13 

Bozdağ SC, Tekgündüz E, Altuntaş F , authors. Treatment of acute graft versus host disease with mesenchymal stem cells: Questions and answers. Transfus Apher Sci. 2016. 54:p. 71–75

Copyright: © 2019 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.