Need for repeat revascularisation in hybrid coronary revascularisation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention

Łukasz Szymański; Natalia Gołąbek; Jakub Piórek; Witold Gerber; Piotr P. Buszman; Krzysztof Sanetra

doi:10.5114/aic.2024.140903

eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338

Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej

Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures

Editorial System

Submit your Manuscript

Editorial Policies

Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

2/2024
vol. 20

Send email

Copy url:

abstract:

Review paper

Need for repeat revascularisation in hybrid coronary revascularisation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention

Łukasz Szymański

¹

,

Natalia Gołąbek

²

,

Jakub Piórek

¹

,

Witold Gerber

^{3, 4}

,

Piotr P. Buszman

^{1, 5, 6}

,

Krzysztof Sanetra

^{4, 7}

Department of Cardiology, Collegium Medicum, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
Students’ Scientific Group at the Second Department of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Academy of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
Department of Cardiac Surgery, American Heart of Poland, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
Department of Cardiology, American Heart of Poland, Bielsko-Biała, Poland
Centre for Cardiovascular Research and Development, American Heart of Poland, Katowice, Poland
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Collegium Medicum, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland

Adv Interv Cardiol 2024; 20, 2 (76): 124–132

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.140903

Online publish date: 2024/06/29

View full text Get citation

EndNote

Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero

AMA

Szymański Ł, Gołąbek N, Piórek J, Gerber W, Buszman P, Sanetra K. Need for repeat revascularisation in hybrid coronary revascularisation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2024;20(2):124-132. doi:10.5114/aic.2024.140903.

APA

Szymański, Ł., Gołąbek, N., Piórek, J., Gerber, W., Buszman, P.,  & Sanetra, K. (2024). Need for repeat revascularisation in hybrid coronary revascularisation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 20(2), 124-132. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.140903

Chicago

Szymański, Łukasz, Natalia Gołąbek, Jakub Piórek, Witold Gerber, Piotr P. Buszman,  and Krzysztof Sanetra. 2024. "Need for repeat revascularisation in hybrid coronary revascularisation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention". Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej 20 (2): 124-132. doi:10.5114/aic.2024.140903.

Harvard

Szymański, Ł., Gołąbek, N., Piórek, J., Gerber, W., Buszman, P.,  and Sanetra, K. (2024). Need for repeat revascularisation in hybrid coronary revascularisation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 20(2), pp.124-132. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.140903

MLA

Szymański, Łukasz et al. "Need for repeat revascularisation in hybrid coronary revascularisation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention." Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, vol. 20, no. 2, 2024, pp. 124-132. doi:10.5114/aic.2024.140903.

Vancouver

Szymański Ł, Gołąbek N, Piórek J, Gerber W, Buszman P, Sanetra K. Need for repeat revascularisation in hybrid coronary revascularisation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2024;20(2):124-132. doi:10.5114/aic.2024.140903.

Hybrid coronary revascularisation (HCR), being a treatment path combining both coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) approaches, offers the advantages of both methods in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Since available literature provides few studies comparing the need for repeat revascularisation (RR) after HCR in comparison to PCI, our review aimed at summarising the latest data on this topic from the last 5 years (2018–2023). The search was conducted within the PubMed and Embase databases, followed by application of inclusion and exclusion criteria and providing a summary of data and characteristics of eligible studies. On the basis of 7 records included in the final analysis, RR and/or follow-up target vessel revascularisation (TVR) were significantly less frequently required in the case of HCR than in PCI in 3 out of 7 records, whereas the remaining four provided no significant differences in analysed rates between the 2 therapeutic pathways. When it comes to lowering the necessity for follow-up TVR and/or RR in a fraction of instances, HCR demonstrates a significant advantage over PCI. The complexity of outcomes associated with these therapies is emphasised by the fact that no statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 methods in the remaining 4 records.

keywords:

Need for repeat revascularisation in hybrid coronary revascularisation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention

Łukasz Szymański 1 , Natalia Gołąbek 2 , Jakub Piórek 1 , Witold Gerber 3, 4 , Piotr P. Buszman 1, 5, 6 , Krzysztof Sanetra 4, 7

percutaneous coronary intervention, repeat revascularisation, hybrid coronary revascularisation

Łukasz Szymański

¹

,

Natalia Gołąbek

²

,

Jakub Piórek

¹

,

Witold Gerber

^{3, 4}

,

Piotr P. Buszman

^{1, 5, 6}

,

Krzysztof Sanetra

^{4, 7}