eISSN: 2299-0038
ISSN: 1643-8876
Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

Open access

without publication fees
4/2024
vol. 23
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
Original paper

New MUSA classification of adenomyosis: correlation of symptoms and clinical severity with direct and indirect features

Sangam Jha
1
,
Nikita Prakash
1
,
Vikas C. Jha
1
,
Upasna Sinha
1

  1. All India Institute of Medical Sciences Patna, Bihar, India
Menopause Rev 2024; 23(4): 185-191
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2024.145950
Online publish date: 2024/12/22
Article file
- New MUSA classification.pdf  [0.25 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Habiba M, Benagiano G, Brosens I. The pathophysiology of adenomyosis. In: Habiba M, Benagiano G, ed. Uterine Adenomyosis. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Publishing AG; 2016: 45-70.
2. Naftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, et al. How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 3432-3439.
3. Li X, Liu X, Guo SW. Clinical profiles of 710 premenopausal women with adenomyosis who underwent hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40: 485-494.
4. Mishra I, Melo P, Easter C, et al. Prevalence of adenomyosis in women with subfertility: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 62: 23-41.
5. Munro MG. Classification and reporting systems for adenomyosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 27: 296-308.
6. Tellum T, Nygaard S, Lieng M. Noninvasive diagnosis of adenomyosis: a structured review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy in imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 27: 408-418.e3.
7. Van den Bosch T, de Bruijn AM, de Leeuw RA, et al. Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 576-582.
8. Rasmussen CK, Van den Bosch T, Exacoustos C, et al. Intra- and inter-rater agreement describing myometrial lesions using morphologic uterus sonographic assessment: a pilot study. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38: 2673-2683.
9. Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA, et al. Consensus on revised definitions of morphological uterus sonographic assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60: 118-131.
10. Exacoustos C, Morosetti G, Conway F, et al. New sonographic classification of adenomyosis: do type and degree of adenomyosis correlate to severity of symptoms? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 27: 1308-1315.
11. Biasioli A, Degano M, Restaino S, et al. Innovative ultrasound criteria for the diagnosis of adenomyosis and correlation with symptoms: a retrospective Re378 evaluation. Biomedicines 2024; 12: 463.
12. Pinzauti S, Lazzeri L, Tosti C, et al. Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30-year-old nulligravid women without endometriosis: association with symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 730-736.
13. Taran FA, Wallwiener M, Kabashi D, et al. Clinical characteristics indicating adenomyosis at the time of hysterectomy: a retrospective study in 291 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 285: 1571-1576.
14. Marques ALS, Andres MP, Mattos LA, et al. Association of 2D and 3D transvaginal ultrasound findings with adenomyosis in symptomatic women of reproductive age: a prospective study. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2021; 76: e2981. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2981.
15. Vannuccini S, Meleca C, Toscano F, et al. Adenomyosis diagnosis among adolescents and young women with dysmenorrhea and heavy menstrual bleeding. Reprod Biomed Online 2024; 48: 103768. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103768.
16. Maldutytė G, Opolskienė G, Rudaitis V, et al. The association between sonographic features and clinical symptoms of adenomyosis. J Clin Ultrasound 2024. doi:10.1002/jcu.23712.
17. Huang Q, Liu X, Critchley H, et al. How does the extent of fibrosis in adenomyosis lesions contribute to heavy menstrual bleeding? Reprod Med Biol 2022; 21: 12442.
18. Giannini A, Golia D’Augè T, Bogani G, et al. Uterine sarcomas: A critical review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 287: 166-170.
Copyright: © 2024 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.