eISSN: 2449-8580
ISSN: 1734-3402
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2024
vol. 26
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Patients’ experiences in primary healthcare institutions

Viljaras Reigas
1

  1. Department of Nursing, SMK University of Applied Sciences, Klaipeda, Lithuania
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review 2024; 26(4): 500–505
Online publish date: 2024/12/29
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Holmlund M. A definition, model, and empirical analysis of business-to-business relationship quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management 2008; 19, doi: 10.1108/09564230810855707.
2. Pettinger R. The Business of Business: The Context of Organisation and Commercial Development. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2016; 221: 11–20, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.085.
3. Kibassa FM. Small Business Research: Upon Finding Definitions of Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneur and Small Firms. European Journal of Business and Management 2012; 4(15): 158–168.
4. [State Accreditation Service for Health Care Activities under the Ministry of Health Protection. 2021 activity report]. Available from URL: https://vaspvt.lrv.lt/lt/administracine-informacija/planavimo-dokumentai/ (in Lithuanian).
5. Almeida F, Faria D, Queirós A. Strengths and Limitations of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. European Journal of Education Studies 2017; 3: 369–387, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.887089.
6. Dahiyat E, El-Dahiyat F, El Refae G. Exploring the factors impacting physicians’ attitudes toward health information exchange with patients in Jordanian hospitals. J Pharm Policy Pract 2023; 16: 7, doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00514-7.
7. Angerer S, Glätzle-Rützler D, Waibel C. Monitoring institutions in healthcare markets: experimental evidence. Health Econ 2021; 30(5): 951–971, doi: 10.1002/hec.4232.
8. Aloh HE, Onwujekwe OE, Aloh OG, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on patient experience on quality of care for ambulatory healthcare services in tertiary hospitals in Southeast Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20(1): 473, doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05332-0.
9. Trihastuti N, Putri S, Widjanarko B. The impact of asymmetric information in medical services: a study in progressive law. Syst Rev Pharmacy 2020; 11(12): 850–855.
10. Doran T, Maurer KA, Ryan AM. Impact of provider incentives on quality and value of health care. Annu Rev Public Health 2017; 38(1): 449–465, doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021457.
11. Kitapci O, Akdogan C, Dortyol İT. The Impact of Service Quality Dimensions on Patient Satisfaction, Repurchase Intentions and Word-of-Mouth Communication in the Public Healthcare Industry. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014; 148: 161–169, doi: 10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.07.030.
12. Kazemi N, Ehsani P, Abdi F, et al. Measuring hospital service quality and its influence on patient satisfaction: An empirical study using structural equation modeling. Manag Sci Lett 2013; 3(7): 2125–2136, doi: 10.5267/J.MSL.2013.06.005.
13. Hennig-Schmidt H, Selten R, Wiesen D. How payment systems affect physicians’ provision behaviour – an experimental investigation. J Health Econ 2011 30(4): 637–646, doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.05.001.
14. Buranapanitkit B, Uakritdathikarn T, Songwathana P. Patients’ attitudes toward doctor-patient relationship after use of computerized technology during medical service. JHSMR 2005; 23(1): 1–15.
15. Taber K. The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha when Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education 2018; 48(1): 1–24, doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
16. Kumah E, Ankomah S, Agyei S, et al. Quality Improvement in Healthcare: A Focus on Patient Focused Strategies. IJBHTM 2020; 9(1): 1–33, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4132550.
17. Kavitha MR. Service Quality Measurement in Health Care System – A Study in Select Hospitals in Salem City, TamilNadu. IOSRJBM 2023; 2(1): 37–43.
18. Flodgren G, Gonçalves-Bradley DC, Pomey MP. External inspection of compliance with standards for improved healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008992.PUB3.
19. Gopal, K. Strategies for Ensuring Quality Health Care in India: Experiences From the Field. Indian J Community Med 2019; 44(1): 1–3, doi: 10.4103/IJCM.IJCM_65_19.
20. Ferdousi F, Baird K, Munir R, et al. Associations between organisational factors, TQM and competitive advantage. Benchmarking: An International Journal 2018; 25(3): 854–873.
21. Dabboor E, Al-Ghadir H, Al-Gasawneh JA, et al. Factors Affecting Physicians Prescriptions: an Empirical Study on Jordanian General Physicians. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology 2021; 25(6): 18631–18647.
22. Murray P, Chapman R. From Continuous improvement to organisational learning: developmental theory. Learning Organization 2003; 10(5): 272–282, doi: 10.1108/09696470310486629.
23. Balasubramanian M. Total quality management [TQM] in the healthcare industry-challenges, barriers and implementation developing a framework for TQM implementation in a healthcare setup. Sci J Public Health 2016; 4(4): 271–278.
24. Turkyilmaz A, Bulak ME, Zaim S. Assessment of TQM Practices as a part of supply chain management in healthcare institutions. IJSCM 2015; 4(4): 1–9.
25. Rouf MA, Debnath SC, Haque ME, et al, Quality of hospital services in 5S-KAIZEN-TQM implemented secondary level hospital: a cross-sectional study. Asian J Med Biol Res 2017; 3(3): 335–340.
26. Awang S, Agins B, Mohd Ujang IR. Development of the National Policy for Quality in Healthcare for Malaysia. Health Res Policy Sys 2012; 119, doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01063-w.
27. Shortell SM, Toussaint JT, Halvorson GC, et al. The Better Care Plan: a blueprint for improving America’s healthcare system. Health Affairs Scholar 2023; 1(1): 1–6, doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad007.
28. Swathi KS, Gopalkrishna B, Somu G. Assessment of healthcare service quality effect on patient satisfaction and care outcomes: a case study in India. Cogent Business & Management 2023; 10: 3, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2264579.
29. Trowman R, Migliore A, Ollendorf DA. The value and impact of health technology assessment: discussions and recommendations from the 2023 Health Technology Assessment International Global Policy Forum. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023; 39(1): 75, doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002763.
30. Jakab I, Dimitrova M, Houÿez F, et al. Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries. Frontiers in Public Health 2023; 11, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176200.
31. Quigley DD, Predmore Z, Martino S, et al. Patient Comments on the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) Survey Reflect Improvements in Provider Behaviors From Coaching. J Healthc Manag 2023; 68(4): 251–267; doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-22-00140.
32. Reiling J, Hughes RG, Murphy MR. The Impact of Facility Design on Patient Safety. In: Hughes RG, ed. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Vol. 2. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Available from URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2633/.
33. Bhaladhare R, Rishipathak P. Assessment of Quality care in the health care sector: A Systematic Review. Eur Chem Bull 2023; 12(4): 1371–1385.
Copyright: © 2024 Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.