en POLSKI
eISSN: 2449-6731
ISSN: 2449-6723
Prenatal Cardiology
Current issue Archive About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
1/2023
 
Share:
Share:
Case report

Prenatal diagnosis of right-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Łukasz Sokołowski
1, 2
,
Magdalena Pałgan
3
,
Iwona Strzelecka
4
,
Oskar Sylwestrzak
1, 2
,
Michał Krekora
1
,
Monika Tadros-Zins
1
,
Piotr Grzelak
5

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital – Research Institute in Lodz, Poland
  2. Department of Prenatal Cardiology, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital – Research Institute in Lodz, Poland
  3. Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
  4. Department of Fetal Malformations Diagnosis and Prevention, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
  5. Department of Radiology, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital – Research Institute in Lodz, Poland
Prenat Cardio 2023; 13 (1): 56-61
Online publish date: 2024/04/03
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia denotes an anomalous development of the fetal diaphragm, resulting in the displacement of the intestines, liver, and/or stomach into the thoracic cavity. This condition is concomitant with fetal lung hypoplasia and pulmonary hypertension. We present a case report of prenatally diagnosed right-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia (RSCDH), which is a much less common variant of this defect and our diagnostics dilemma comparing ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data.

Case report

The patient was a 37-year-old pregnant woman. This was her fourth pregnancy; the first ended with a vaginal delivery of a full-term newborn, the next 2 ended with spontaneous miscarriages in the first trimesters. The last miscarriage occurred 3 months before the current pregnancy. The pregnant woman was obese (BMI 33). In the first trimester of pregnancy, she was diagnosed with gestational diabetes, which was initially treated only by diet and since the 26th week of pregnancy required insulin therapy.
No fetal abnormalities were detected in the screening obstetric ultrasound examination in the 13th week of pregnancy. In an anomaly-scan ultrasound examination in the 22nd week of pregnancy, in this high-risk pregnancy, the obstetrician found an abnormal mass in the right part of the fetal chest and a shift of the heart to the left side of the chest. Suspected of diaphragmatic hernia, he referred the pregnant woman to our referral centre.
A total of 4 fetal ultrasound + echocardiographic examinations were performed in our centre (Figure 1). Based on ultrasound evaluation the fetus was found to have a pathological mass with echogenicity resembling intestines in the right part of the chest. This mass moved the heart to the left side and compressed it. The value of the heart area/chest area (HA/CA) ratio was 0.19 (below normal) (Figure 2). The fetal stomach was visible or in fetal chest or below the diaphragm (Figure 3). There were no structural or functional changes in the fetal heart. Circulatory system efficiency was assessed at 8/10 points on the CVPS scale (–2 points for heart size below normal). A normal fetal growth trend was observed in all studies. The volume of amniotic fluid remained within normal limits (AFI 17-22 cm). Flow spectra in the umbilical arteries and middle cerebral arteries were normal. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging was performed in the 27th week of pregnancy. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the presence of diaphragmatic hernia in the fetus with displacement of the intestines into the chest (Figure 4). At 26 weeks of pregnancy, prenatal steroid therapy (betamethasone) was administered, and a consultation was scheduled to consider fetal balloon tracheal occlusion (FETO). However, before the consultation took place, the premature rupture of membranes occurred in the 28th week of pregnancy. In the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy was implemented, laboratory markers of inflammation were controlled, and the well-being of the fetus and the pregnant woman was monitored. The last fetal ultrasound and fetal echocardiographic examination was performed in the 31st week of pregnancy. The absolute value of the LHR index was 0.71, which was 36% of the expected value for this week of pregnancy. These values suggested an unfavourable prognosis. Additionally, slight protosystolic tricuspid valve regurgitation and small pericardial effusion (< 2.5 mm) were found. Circulatory system efficiency was assessed at 7/10 on the CVPS scale. Estimated fetal weight and peripheral Doppler flows were normal.
Five days after the last ultrasound and echocardiographic examination, the pregnant woman experienced regular uterine contractions leading to shortening and dilatation of the cervix. Due to fetal tachycardia of 200/min detected in the CTG examination, the impending intrauterine fetal asphyxia was suspected, and delivery was performed by emergency caesarean section.
The birth weight of the female newborn was 1800 g. The Apgar score was 5/6/6/7, and the blood pH was 7.084. On the first day after birth, the newborn’s condition was serious, mechanical ventilation was implemented with pressor amines. An X-ray examination in the newborn confirmed a RSCDH with displacement of the intestines into the chest (Figure 5). The newborn was diagnosed with anaemia (haemoglobin 11 g%, haematocrit 33%), and RBC was transfused. Escherichia coli bacteria were cultured from the blood culture. The ECHO examination confirmed the normal structure of the heart and showed signs of pulmonary hypertension. On the second day of life, a surgical procedure was performed to divert the intestines from the chest into the abdominal cavity and close the defect in the diaphragm. On the sixth day of life, the deterioration of respiratory and circulatory efficiency occurred, with no response to treatment attempts. The newborn was pronounced dead on the same day. At the parents’ request, an autopsy was not performed. ,h3>Discussion,/h3> The presented case involved a high-risk pregnancy that commenced 3 months after a prior miscarriage. Research by Strzelecka et al. indicates that, in instances of poor outcome of previous pregnancy (miscarriage or congenital heart defects in the fetus), maintaining an interval of at least 24 months between pregnancies may increase the probability of normal outcome in a subsequent pregnancy [1].
Evidence reveals that cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) with concurrent defects are more prevalent than isolated CDH cases. Between 1980 and 2009 in Europe, CDH with concurrent defects occurred at a rate of 2.3 per 10,000 births, while isolated CDH occurred at a rate of 1.6 per 10,000 births [2]. The primary concurrent defects include heart abnormalities, which align with a similar timeline of diaphragm development. Additional defects encompass craniofacial, central nervous system, and chromosomal abnormalities [2-4]. The co-occurrence of defects heightens the risk of mortality, with a 100% mortality rate associated with central nervous system and heart defects [3].
Left-sided diaphragmatic hernia prevails in fetal cases, with right-sided occurrences being less frequent. RSCDH are linked to a higher mortality rate, often attributed to larger defect sizes. Research also indicates that the defect’s size, rather than its lateralisation, plays a more pivotal role in determining the prognosis [5-7] (Table 1).
Between 2018 and 2023, at the Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital in Lodz (Poland), 9 newborns were born with congenital right-sided diaphragmatic hernia. This represented 12% of all newborns born with CDH in these years (Figure 6). In 77.8% (7/9) of cases, it was an isolated defect. In 22.2% (2/9) of cases, there was an accompanying congenital heart defect. The mean gestational age was 34.3 weeks (SD ±3.5). Caesarean section delivery occurred in 88.9% (8/9) of cases. Female newborns accounted for 55.6% (5/9) and male newborns for 44.4% (4/9). The mean birth weight was 2109 g (SD ±523 g). The mean Apgar score at one minute of life was 4.4 (SD ±2.7). The mean Apgar score at 5 minutes of life was 5.9 (SD ±2.1). Neonatal mortality upon discharge from the hospital was 66.7% (6/9). Newborns who survived until hospital discharge were born on average at 36.7 (SD ±2.1) weeks of gestation with a mean birth weight of 2317 g (SD ±293 g). Newborns who died before hospital discharge were born on average at 33.2 (SD ±3.6) weeks of gestation with a mean birth weight of 2005 g (SD ±604 g) (Table 2).
The congenital diaphragmatic hernia diagnosis relies on ultrasound scans, with the average gestational age at diagnosis being 22-24 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging with lung volume assessment may enhance diagnostic accuracy, overcoming limitations posed by maternal obesity or oligohydramnios and providing superior soft tissue contrast [8]. Right-sided hernias pose a diagnostic challenge due to ultrasound imaging characteristics [5, 9-11] (Table 3).
Accurate diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and determination of the defect’s side necessitate proper identification of the left and right sides of the fetal body. This involves discerning fetal position (longitudinal/oblique/transverse, cephalic/pelvic) and locating the fetal spine. For example, if the fetus is in a longitudinal cephalic position and its spine is directed towards the left side of the uterine cavity, the left side of the fetal body will be directed towards the bottom of the ultrasound screen. If the fetus is in a longitudinal breech position and its spine is directed towards the left side of the uterine cavity, then the left side of the fetal body will be directed towards the top of the ultrasound screen. Placement of a pictogram displaying the fetal position on the screen during ultrasound and echocardiographic examinations aids image analysis and helps reduce diagnostic errors [12].
Recent studies have identified specific genetic mutations associated with RSCDH, such as mutations in the GATA4 transcription factor. Genetic testing can help identify people at risk of developing RSCDH and facilitate early intervention and genetic counselling [13-15].
Hypoplasia of the developing heart in CDH is a well-documented observation, initially identified in post-mortem studies and subsequently confirmed by echocardiography analyses. In RSCDH, limited available data suggest a reduction in both fetal right ventricular and pulmonary arterial dimensions, with less severe left ventricular hypoplasia than in left-sided CDH [9]. Potential indicators of poor prognosis in CDH include a small diameter of the ascending aorta (AAo) and a high ratio of pulmonary artery diameter to ascending aorta diameter (MPA/AAo) [16].
The risk of preterm delivery is elevated when CDH is diagnosed in the fetus, estimated to be between 22 and 35%. Cohort studies posit that preterm birth amplifies the mortality rate in CDH-affected fetuses, with a higher risk for RSCDH [17, 18]. One potential risk factor for premature delivery is the presence of polyhydramnios due to oesophageal compression and fetal swallowing impairment [8].
The risk factors of poor outcome in CDH are summarised in Table 4.
In recent years, laparoscopic surgery has gained popularity as a less invasive alternative to open surgery for RSCDH. The benefits of using laparoscopic techniques, such as mesh repair and suturing, are reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery [19, 20].

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Strzelecka I, Słodki M, Chrzanowski J, Rizzo G, Respondek-Liberska M. An investigation of the optimal inter-pregnancy interval following pregnancy with a fetus with congenital heart disease. Arch Med Sci 2022; 18: 388-394.
2. McGivern MR, Best KE, Rankin J, Wellesley D, Greenlees R, Addor MC, et al. Epidemiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: a register-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015; 100: F137-F144.
3. Respondek-Liberska M, Foryś S, Janiszewska-Skorupa J, Szaflik K, Wilczyński J, Oszukowski P, et al. Problemy diagnostyczne i losy płodów z przepukliną przeponową w ośrodku referencyjnym ICZMP w latach 1994-2006 [Diaphragmatic hernia in reference hospital ICZMP – diagnostic problems and outcome]. Ginekol Pol 2008; 79: 23-30.
4. Więckowska K, Dudarewicz L, Moczulska H, Słodki M, Pietrzak Z, Respondek-Liberska M. Postnatal outcomes of children with prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease combined with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Prenat Cardio 2014; 4: 23-27.
5. Burgos CM, Frenckner B, Luco M, Harting MT, Lally PA, Lally KP, et al. Right versus left congenital diaphragmatic hernia – What’s the difference? J Pediatr Surg 2017; S0022-3468(17)30649-8.
6. Jeong J, Lee BS, Cha T, Jung E, Kim EAR, Kim KS, et al. Prenatal prognostic factors for isolated right congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a single center’s experience. BMC Pediatr 2021; 21: 460.
7. Abramov A, Fan W, Hernan R, Zenilman AL, Wynn J, Aspelund G, et al. Comparative outcomes of right versus left congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a multicenter analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2020; 55: 33-38.
8. Kosiński P, Wielgoś M. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: pathogenesis, prenatal diagnosis and management – literature review. Ginekol Pol 2017; 88: 24-30.
9. Patel N, Massolo AC, Kraemer US, Kipfmueller F. The heart in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Knowns, unknowns, and future priorities. Front Pediatr 2022; 10: 890422.
10. Conturso R, Giorgetta F, Bellussi F, Youssef A, Tenore A, Pilu G, et al. Horizontal stomach: a new sonographic clue to the antenatal diagnosis of right-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 340-341.
11. Morgan TA, Basta A, Filly RA. Fetal stomach and gallbladder in contact with the bladder wall is a common ultrasound sign of stomach-down left congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Clin Ultrasound 2017; 45: 8-13.
12. Karuga F, Szmyd B, Respondek-Liberska M. Fetal congenital heart disease and fetal position – are they related? Prenat Cardio 2019; 9: 33-36.
13. Schreiner Y, Schaible T, Rafat N. Genetics of diaphragmatic hernia. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 29: 1729-1733.
14. Wynn J, Yu L, Chung WK. Genetic causes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 19: 324-330.
15. Yu L, Hernan RR, Wynn J, Chung WK. The influence of genetics in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Perinatol 2020: 44: 151169.
16. Krekora M, Sokołowski Ł, Murlewska J, Zych-Krekora K, Słodki M, Grzesiak M, et al. Small prenatal diameter of the ascending aorta is associated with increased mortality risk in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Arch Med Sci 2022; 19: 1022-1027.
17. Horn-Oudshoorn EJJ, Russo FM, Deprest JA, Kipfmueller F, Geipel A, Schaible T, et al. Survival in very preterm infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and association with prenatal imaging markers: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2023; 130: 1403-1411.
18. Skari H, Bjornland K, Haugen G, Egeland T, Emblem R. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a meta-analysis of mortality factors. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35: 1187-1197.
19. Zhu Y, Wu Y, Pu Q, Ma L, Liao H, Liu L. Minimally invasive surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a meta-analysis. Hernia 2016; 20: 297-302.
20. Quigley CP, Folaranmi SE. A systematic review comparing the surgical outcomes of open versus minimally invasive surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023; 33: 211-219.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.