eISSN: 1731-2531
ISSN: 1642-5758
Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search

Open access

without publication fees

Journal integrated with

integrated with publons
5/2024
vol. 56
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
Original article

Process optimisation: spinal versus general anaesthesia for endourological surgery. A randomised, controlled trial and machine-learning approach

Kornel Skitek
1
,
Gregor A. Schittek
2
,
Jens Soukup
3

  1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
  2. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
  3. Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Palliative Care Medicine, Medical University Lausitz – Carl Thiem, Cottbus, Germany
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2024; 56, 5: 285–294
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2024.146716
Online publish date: 2025/01/17
Article file
- Process optimisation.pdf  [0.20 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Brannen GE. Endourology in perspective. Urology 1986; 28: 161-172. DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(86)90035-x.
2. Borendal Wodlin N, Nilsson L, Carlsson P, Kjølhede P. Cost-effectiveness of general anesthesia vs spinal anesthesia in fast-track abdominal benign hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 326.e1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.043.
3. Abdelwahab O, Habous M, Aziz M, Sultan M, Farag M, Santucci R, et al. Bipolar vaporization of the prostate may cause higher complication rates compared to bipolar loop resection: a randomized prospective trial. Int Urol Nephrol 2019; 51: 2143-2148. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02280-5.
4. Hayashida Y, Miyata Y, Matsuo T, Ohba K, Sakai H, Taba M, et al. A pilot study to assess the safety and usefulness of combined transurethral endoscopic mucosal resection and en-bloc resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. BMC Urol 2019; 19: 56. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0486-0.
5. Pietropaolo A, Bres-Niewada E, Skolarikos A, Liatsikos E, Kallidonis P, Aboumarzouk O, et al. Worldwide survey of flexible ureteroscopy practice: a survey from European Association of Urology sections of young academic urologists and uro-technology groups. Centr Eur J Urol 2019; 72: 393-397. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2019.0041.
6. Ding D, Ishag S. Aldrete Scoring System. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
7. Craig D, Carli F. Bromage motor blockade score – a score that has lasted more than a lifetime. Can J Anaesth 2018; 65: 837-838. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-018-1101-7.
8. Erhan E, Ugur G, Anadolu O, Saklayan M, Ozyar B. General anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia for outpatient urological surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20: 647-652. DOI: 10.1017/s0265021503001042.
9. Rätsch G, Niebergall H, Hauenstein L, Reber A. Spinal anaesthesia in day-case surgery. Optimisation of procedures. Der Anaesthesist 2007; 56: 322-327 [Article in German]. DOI: 10.1007/s00101-007-1141-9.
10. Podgorelec V, Kokol P, Stiglic B, Rozman I. Decision trees: an overview and their use in medicine. J Med Syst 2002; 26: 445-463. DOI: 10.1023/a:1016409317640.
11. Fasel B. An introduction to bio-inspired artificial neural network architectures. Acta Neurol Belg 2003; 103: 6-12.
12. Hashimoto DA, Witkowski E, Gao L, Meireles O, Rosman G. Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: current techniques, clinical applications, and limitations. Anesthesiology 2020; 132: 379-394. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002960.
13. Flaishon R, Ekstein P, Matzkin H, Weinbroum AA. An evaluation of general and spinal anesthesia techniques for prostate brachytherapy in a day surgery setting. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1656-1658. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000184205.43759.55.
14. Danelli G, Berti M, Casati A, Albertin A, Deni F, Nobili F, et al. Spinal block or total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil for gynaecological outpatient procedures. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002; 19: 594-599. DOI: 10.1017/s0265021502000960.
15. Tyritzis SI, Stravodimos KG, Vasileiou I, Fotopoulou G, Koritsiadis G, Migdalis V, et al. Spinal versus general anaesthesia in postoperative pain management during transurethral procedures. ISRN Urol 2011; 2011: 895874. DOI: 10.5402/2011/895874.
16. Chakladar A, White SM. Cost estimates of spinal versus general anaesthesia for fractured neck of femur surgery. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 810-814. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06382.x.
17. Finsterwald M, Muster M, Farshad M, Saporito A, Brada M, Aguir­re JA. Spinal versus general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery in high risk patients: perioperative hemodynamic stability, complications and costs. J Clin Anesth 2018; 46: 3-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.01.004.
18. Cornu JN, Herrmann T, Traxer O, Matlaga B. Prevention and management following complications from endourology procedures. Eur Urol Focus 2016; 2: 49-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.03.014.
19. Ghaffari S, Dehghanpisheh L, Tavakkoli F, Mahmoudi H. The effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on quality of life in women undergoing cesarean delivery on maternal request. Cureus 2018; 10: e3715. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3715.
20. Wilson JM, Farley KX, Erens GA, Guild GN. General vs spinal anes­thesia for revision total knee arthroplasty: do complication rates differ? J Arthroplasty 2019; 34: 1417-1422. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth. 2019.03.048.
21. Shetabi H, Akrami Moghaddam F, Kazemi R. Comparison of intravenous sedation with propofol, dexmedetomidine and midazolam in double-J ureteral stent removal. Am J Clin Exp Urol 2023; 11: 160-167.
22. Lewis SR, Pritchard MW, Fawcett LJ, Punjasawadwong Y. Bispectral index for improving intraoperative awareness and early postoperative recovery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 9: CD003843. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003843.pub4.
23. Gao WW, He YH, Liu L, Yuan Q, Wang YF, Zhao B. BIS monitoring on intraoperative awareness: a meta-analysis. Curr Med Sci 2018; 38: 349-353. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-018-1886-1.
24. Morris MT, Morris J, Wallace C, Cho W, Sharan A, Abouelrigal M, et al. An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of spinal versus general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery in various hospital settings. Global Spine J 2019; 9: 368-374. DOI: 10.1177/2192568218795867.
25. Hu S, Zhang ZY, Hua YQ, Li J, Cai ZD. A comparison of regional and general anaesthesia for total replacement of the hip or knee: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91: 935-942. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21538.
26. Axelsson KH, Edstrom HH, Sundberg AE, Widman GB. Spinal anaes­thesia with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine: effects of volume. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1982; 26: 439-445. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1982.tb01796.x.
27. Chambers WA, Littlewood DG, Edstrom HH, Scott DB. Spinal anaes­thesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine: effects of concentration and volume administered. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54: 75-80. DOI: 10.1093/bja/54.1.75.
28. Hanss R, Buttgereit B, Tonner PH, Bein B, Schleppers A, Steinfath M, et al. Overlapping induction of anesthesia: an analysis of benefits and costs. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 391-400. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200508000-00023.
29. Kendale S, Kulkarni P, Rosenberg AD, Wang J. Supervised machine-learning predictive analytics for prediction of postinduction hypotension. Anesthesiology 2018; 129: 675-688. DOI: 10.1097/ALN. 0000000000002374.
30. Lundberg SM, Nair B, Vavilala MS, Horibe M, Eisses MJ, Adams T, et al. Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery. Nat Biomed Eng 2018; 2: 749-760. DOI: 10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0.
31. Sobrie O, Lazouni MEA, Mahmoudi S, Mousseau V, Pirlot M. A new decision support model for preanesthetic evaluation. Comput Me­thods Programs Biomed 2016; 133: 183-193. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb. 2016.05.021.
32. Meyer A, Zverinski D, Pfahringer B, Kempfert J, Kuehne T, Sundermann SH, et al. Machine learning for real-time prediction of complications in critical care: a retrospective study. Lancet Respir Med 2018; 6: 905-914. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30300-X.
33. Awaysheh A, Wilcke J, Elvinger F, Rees L, Fan W, Zimmerman KL. Review of medical decision support and machine-learning methods. Vet Pathol 2019; 56: 512-525. DOI: 10.1177/0300985819829524.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.