eISSN: 1644-4124
ISSN: 1426-3912
Central European Journal of Immunology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2013
vol. 38
 
Share:
Share:

Review paper
Role of complement factors and their inhibitors in the myocardial infarction

Tomasz Ilczuk
,
Aleksander Wasiutyński

(Centr Eur J Immunol 2013; 38 (2): 251-253)
Online publish date: 2013/07/08
Article file
- Role of complement.pdf  [0.07 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
Cardiovascular diseases and ischemic heart disease in particular with its extreme form – myocardial infarction, are responsible for approximately 40% of deaths in Poland and worldwide and therefore constitute one of the main problems of contemporary medicine. Despite widespread information, e.g. in the media, and multiple scientific publications, many aspects of these disorders remain unclear. Multiple factors can exacerbate ischemic heart disease, resulting in myocardial infarction: complete occlusion of an artery by a clot resulting from a ruptured atherosclerotic plaque [1]; an embolus originating from thrombi formed on the left ventricular valves; sudden increase of myocardial oxygen demand with coexisting impairment of coronary reserve; arteritis [2, 3]. At the current stage of development of biomedical sciences, the disease progression is thought to be modulated by multiple immunological, biochemical and biophysical factors determined by genetic and environmental circumstances [4].

Damage of the barrier between cardiomyocyte cytoplasm and extracellular environment resulting from is­chemia is an important factor for the involvement of immunological mechanisms. Synthesis of ATP that is required for preservation of integrity of the cellular membrane and lysosomal membranes, is reduced, resulting in sarcolemmal damage. The mechanism of ionic exchange is disturbed, what results in inhibition of metabolite removal with subsequent accumulation of lactate, phosphate, ammonium and sodium ions in the cardiomyocytes. Increased osmotic pressure results in edema and cardiomyocyte rupture. Increased sarcolemmal permeability is also caused by the presence of superoxide and hydroxyl free radicals in higher amounts in the ischemic myocardium with simultaneous reduction of contents of inactivators [5]. The surface of all myocardial cells undergoes modification as a result of expression of adhesion molecules. Adhesion molecules are expressed at the border between the endothelium and necrotic cardiomyocytes, both on the surface of the endothelium as well as in the plasma, as soluble adhesion molecules [6]. Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1), also known as CD31, is also expressed on endothelial cells. These molecules are located on side surfaces of endothelial cells but also exist on peripheral blood monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils and lymphocytes. CD31 located on side surfaces of endothelial cells acts to allow leukocyte migration between these cells [7]. Results of studies performed on animal models involving blockade of PECAM-1 with specific antibodies, demonstrated that leukocyte migration is inhibited during inflammation. Therefore, CD31 blockade in the ischemic myocardium could prevent post-myocardial infarction injury of the myocardium, most probably by inhibiting transendothelial neutrophil migration [8-10].

Neutrophil and monocyte/macrophage migration to ischemic sites is initiated by chemotactic activity of complement factors – predominantly C3a and C5a – on these cells. An infiltration of migrating cells is a response to ischemia-triggered changes. This phenomenon was described for the first time by Mallory et al. in 1939 [11]. Inflammatory mediators that are released in the ischemic area as well as secreted by damaged cells, stimulate phagocytic cells and these may remove damaged and healthy cells found in the infracted zone. Myocardial cell destruction during reperfusion by neutrophils results from their adhesion to each other. It is mediated by ICAM-1 molecule, expressed on cardiomyocyte surface [12]. Its increased expression occurs within the first 36 hours, i.e. during an acute inflammatory response that leukocytes are involved in [13]. Migrating cells undergo activation, resulting in formation of an inflammatory infiltration in the ischemic myocardium related to stimulation of the cytokine network. Scientific reports published over the recent years in the area of cytokine-mediated regulatory mechanisms, did not fully elucidate their role in the ischemia [14].

Cells of ischemic myocardium acquire foreign antigenic profile for the immune system, what results in complement activation and formation of a membrane attacking complex that damages myocardial cells (Fig. 1). By binding their surfaces, it exacerbates the infarction-related injury. Formation and deposition of large amounts of MAC on the cardiomyocyte surface are caused by the loss of protective CD59 antigen – protectin that by binding C8 complement factor from the C5b678 complex, blocks binding of C9, which makes MAC formation impossible [15-17]. Studies performed on experimental animal models of myocardial infarction demonstrated a potential pathophysiological role of activation of the complement system as a result of tissue ischemia. Complement elimination as well as injection of a recombinant soluble receptor for C1 complement factor was shown to reduce the size of tissue injury [5, 18, 19]. Blockade of neutrophil adhesion or reduction of the monocyte/macrophage number by monoclonal antibodies in the initial phase of reperfusion could be one of the possible means for reduction of the ischemic area [11, 20].

As mentioned above, myocardial infarction is one of the most common causes of death. Its pathomechanism remains unclear despite the fact that many research studies have been conducted to understand it. Basing on the research report, immune reactions in the myocardium are thought to play an ever increasing role. There are no detailed studies on the role of the complement system and its inhibitors in the development and pathogenesis of myocardial infarction in available literature. Only few studies focus on a wider context – integration between cellular and humoral immune response [15, 21-26]. The significant and sometimes decisive role of the complement system in the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction seems highly probable and simultaneously is attractive from a therapeutic point of view. The continuous development of civilization is accompanied by a marked increase of prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and cardiovascular mortality. Considering the fact that activation of the complement system exacerbates pathological changes resulting from vascular atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction, use of inhibitors of this system is being considered. Due to this fact studies of the complement system in the context of myocardial infarction as well as other pathological changes should be continued and extended, using modern research techniques in the hope that they will contribute to the effective fight against diseases that modern medicine is largely helpless against.



The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

 1. Standardy PTK. Zawał serca. Uwagi ogólne. http://www.ptkardio.pl.

 2. Groniowski J, Kruś S (1991): Podstawy patomorfologii. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa.

 3. Lewczuk A, Hirnle T, Sobkowicz B i wsp. (2009): Choroba wieńcowa i zawał serca u pacjentów z zaburzeniami gospodarki węglowodanowej. Przegląd Kardiologiczny 3: 285-295.

 4. Derzhko R, Witkowska M (2010): Zaburzenia gospodarki węglowodanowej a ryzyko chorób układu sercowo-naczy­niowego. Adr Clin Exp Med 15: 911-916.

 5. Kruś S, Skrzypek-Fakhoury E (2011): Patomorfologia kliniczna. Wyd. III. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa; 74-77, 258-297.

 6. Ishibashi T, Kijima M, Yokoyama K (1999): Expression of cytokine and adhesion molecule mRNA in atherectomy specimens from patients with coronary artery disease. Jpn Circ J 63: 249-254.

 7. Gołąb J, Jakóbisiak M, Lasek W, Stokłosa T (2011): Im­munologia. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa; 66-77.

 8. Roitt I, Brostoff J, Male D (1996): Immunologia. Wydawnic­-­two Medyczne Słotwiński Varlag, Brema.

 9. Ptak W, Ptak M, Szczepaniak M (2010): Podstawy im­munologii. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa; 43-59.

10. Murohara T, Delyani JA, Albelda SM, Lefer AM (1996): Blockade of endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 protects against myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury in cats.

J Immunol 156: 3550-3557.

11. Brady AJ (1995): Neutrophils in heart disease – stormtroopers of the immune system. Eur Heart J 16: 151-152.

12. Niessen HW, Lagrand WK, Visser CA, et al. (1999): Upregulation of ICAM-1 on cardiomyocytes in jeopardized human myokardium during infarction. Cardiovasc Res 41: 603-610.

13. Pudil R, Pidrman V, Krejsek J, et al. (1999): Cytokines and adhesion molecules in the course myocardial infarction. Clin Chim Acta 280: 127-134.

14. Kumar V, Cotran RS, Robbins SL (2005): Basic pathology. Wyd. I pol. pod red. Włodzimierza T. Olszewskiego. Wy­daw­nictwo Medyczne Urban & Partner, Wrocław; 374-453.

15. Diamond LE, McCurry KR, Oldham ER, et al. (2011): Human CD59 expressed in transgenic mouse hearts inhibits the activation of complement. Transpl Immunol 3: 305-312.

16. Väkevä A, Laurila P, Meri S (2011): Loss of expression of protectin (CD59) is associated with complement membrane attack complex deposition in myocardial infarction. Lab Invest 67: 608-616.

17. Wojnicz D, Jankowski S (2000): Białko CD59 – charakte­rystyka i jego rola w ochronie komórek przed działaniem dopełniacza. Pods Mikrobiol 39: 37-53.

18. Roitt I, Brostoff J, Male D (1996): Immunologia. Wydawnic­­-two Medyczne Słotwiński Varlag, Brema.

19. Lucchesi BR, Kilgore KS (1997): Complement inhibitors in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Immunopharmacology 38: 27-42.

20. Trial J, Baughn RE, Wygant JN, et al. (1999): Fibronectin fragments modulate monocyte VLA-5 expression and monocyte migration. J Clin Invest 104: 419-430.

21. Morgan BP (2000): Regulation of the complement membrane attack pathway. Crit Rev Immunol 19: 173-198.

22. Tada T, Okada H, Okada N, et al. (1997): Membrane attack complex of complemeny and 20kDa homologous restriction factor (CD59) in myocardial infarction. Virchows Arch 430: 327-332.

23. Thiel S (2007): Complement activating soluble pattern

recognition molecules with collagen-like regions, mannan-binding lectin, ficolins and associated proteins. Mol Immunol 44: 3875-3888.

24. Wojnicz D, Jankowski S (2002): Rola białkowych glikoprotein CD46, CD55, CD59 w ochronie komórek przed licznym działaniem dopełniacza. Pods Hig Dośw 603-616.

25. Väkevä A, Meri S (1998): Complement activation and regulator expression after anoxic injury of human endothelial cells. AMPIS 106: 1149-1156.

26. Sochacka M, Błach-Olszewska Z (2006): Mechanizmy wro­-dzonej odporności. Pod Hig Med Doś 59: 250-258.
Copyright: © 2013 Polish Society of Experimental and Clinical Immunology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.