eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2015
vol. 11
 
Share:
Share:

Short communication
Catheter inside the right heart for 22 years: to intervene or not to intervene?

Tolga Çimen
,
Mehmet Doğan
,
Ahmet Akyel
,
Ekrem Yeter

Postep Kardiol Inter 2015; 11, 1 (39): 62–63
Online publish date: 2015/03/06
Article file
Get citation
 
 

Introduction

There are scarce case reports about leaving foreign objects inside the body during open heart surgery or related invasive procedures. Central venous catheterisation is used as an intravenous line; it is necessary for haemodialysis and for the measurement of the right heart pressures, so it is essential during these kinds of surgeries.
We present the case of a man who had an operation for sinus valsalva aneurysm rupture 22 years ago and had an asymptomatic catheter fragment in the right heart.

Case report

A 56-year-old male patient who had an operation for sinus valsalva aneurism rupture 22 years previously was referred to the cardiology department for routine control. He had no complaint. He was unable to find his surgical report. In his medical history he had hypertension and aortic operation. On physical examination he had soft early diastolic murmur at left sternal border. The ECG was at sinus rhythm. On transthorasic examination he had ascending aortic dilatation (5 cm) and minimal aortic regurgitation. In addition he had a hyperechogenic mass resembling a pacemaker electrode extending from the right atrium to the right ventricle. This piece was not radio-opaque on the chest X-ray (Figure 1). Cardiac computed tomography (CT) angiogram revealed that this piece was a catheter extending from the right ventricle to the right atrial appendage (Figures 2–3). The catheter fragment was approximately 14 cm long and had a diameter of 3.3 mm. He had no arrhythmia on 24-hour Holter monitoring. The patient was asymptomatic and decided to be followed noninvasively.

Discussion

Embolisation of central venous catheters occurs rarely, but they can cause serious complications such as fatal ventricular arrhythmias, septic embolisations, endocarditis, and right heart failure secondary to repetitive thromboembolism [1]. Pinch-off syndrome, described as breakage of the catheter due to compression of the central venous catheter at the infraclavicular area, is known to be the most common reason [2]. Besides iatrogenic destruction of the catheters during exchange or removal, disconnection of the cannula from the fitting side, and the rupture of the catheter are the other reasons. Emboli usually occurs to the vena cava superior or peripheral veins (15.4%), right atrium (27.6%), right ventricle (22%), or pulmonary arteries (35%) [1]. Most of them can be removed percutaneously and surgery is necessary only in rare cases [3, 4]. Some authors recommend the removal of the catheters even in asymptomatic patients due to the risk of distal embolisation and endocarditis; there are also cases that have not been removed [5–7]. Our patient was asymptomatic after 22 years, so we thought that the catheter would be stabilised due to endothelialisation and we did not want take the risk of complications during removal.

Conclusions

In the case of the early diagnosis of the embolisation of the fragmented catheters, percutaneous removal could be the preferred way of treatment; however, asymptomatic patients diagnosed after a long time can be followed non-invasively. Treatment of the patients should be individualised, taking into account the risk of thrombosis, arrhythmia, and infection.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Surov A, Wienke A, Carter JM, et al. Intravascular embolization of venous catheter: causes, clinical signs, and management: a systematic review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2009; 33: 677-85.
2. Aitken DR, Minton JP. The “pinch-off sign”: a warning of impending problems with permanent subclavian catheters. Am J Surg 1984; 148: 633-6.
3. Onal B, Coskun B, Karabulut R, et al. Interventional radiological retrieval of embolized vascular access device fragments. Diagn Interv Radiol 2012; 18: 87-91.
4. Nair HC, Banakal S, Parachuri VR, et al. Entrapped central venous catheter after mitral valve replacement and its surgical retrieval. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 15: 566-7.
5. Toda R, Yuda T, Nishida T, et al. Retrieval of intravascular catheter fragment remaining for 15 years: a case report. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1997; 45: 51-4.
6. Thanigaraj S, Panneerselvam A, Yanos J. Retrieval of an IV catheter fragment from the pulmonary artery 11 years after embolization. Chest 2000; 117: 1209-11.
7. El-Heis S, Ormerod JO, Chandrasekaran B, et al. A retained pulmonary artery catheter fragment incidentally found lodged in the right heart 16 years after its insertion. BMJ Case Rep 2013 Mar 26; 2013. pii: bcr2013008640. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-008640.
Copyright: © 2015 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.