Should molecular subtype be recommended as one of the selection criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation? Preliminary results from an Asian cohort

Tabassum Wadasadawala; Monidipa Mondal; Siji Nojin Paul; Vani Parmar; Nita Nair; Tanuja Shet; Sangeeta Desai; Sudeep Gupta; Rajiv Sarin

doi:10.5114/jcb.2018.74137

eISSN: 2081-2841
ISSN: 1689-832X

Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy

Current Issue Archive Supplements Articles in Press Journal Information Aims and Scope Editorial Office Editorial Board Register as Author Register as Reviewer Instructions for Authors Abstracting and indexing Subscription Advertising Information Links

Editorial System

Submit your Manuscript

1/2018
vol. 10

Send email

Copy url:

abstract:

Original paper

Should molecular subtype be recommended as one of the selection criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation? Preliminary results from an Asian cohort

Tabassum Wadasadawala

,

Monidipa Mondal

,

Siji Nojin Paul

,

Vani Parmar

,

Nita Nair

,

Tanuja Shet

,

Sangeeta Desai

,

Sudeep Gupta

,

Rajiv Sarin

J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10, 1: 47–57

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.74137

Online publish date: 2018/02/28

View full text Get citation

EndNote

Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero

AMA

Wadasadawala T, Mondal M, Paul S, et al. Should molecular subtype be recommended as one of the selection criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation? Preliminary results from an Asian cohort. Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy. 2018;10(1):47-57. doi:10.5114/jcb.2018.74137.

APA

Wadasadawala, T., Mondal, M., Paul, S., Parmar, V., Nair, N.,  & Shet, T. et al. (2018). Should molecular subtype be recommended as one of the selection criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation? Preliminary results from an Asian cohort. Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy, 10(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.74137

Chicago

Wadasadawala, Tabassum, Monidipa Mondal, Siji Nojin Paul, Vani Parmar, Nita Nair, Tanuja Shet,  and Sangeeta Desai et al. 2018. "Should molecular subtype be recommended as one of the selection criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation? Preliminary results from an Asian cohort". Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy 10 (1): 47-57. doi:10.5114/jcb.2018.74137.

Harvard

Wadasadawala, T., Mondal, M., Paul, S., Parmar, V., Nair, N., Shet, T., Desai, S., Gupta, S.,  and Sarin, R. (2018). Should molecular subtype be recommended as one of the selection criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation? Preliminary results from an Asian cohort. Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy, 10(1), pp.47-57. https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.74137

MLA

Wadasadawala, Tabassum et al. "Should molecular subtype be recommended as one of the selection criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation? Preliminary results from an Asian cohort." Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy, vol. 10, no. 1, 2018, pp. 47-57. doi:10.5114/jcb.2018.74137.

Vancouver

Wadasadawala T, Mondal M, Paul S, Parmar V, Nair N, Shet T et al. Should molecular subtype be recommended as one of the selection criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation? Preliminary results from an Asian cohort. Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy. 2018;10(1):47-57. doi:10.5114/jcb.2018.74137.

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to report clinical outcomes in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), stratified as per molecular subtype and American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ASTRO/GEC-ESTRO) patient selection criteria in order to determine whether molecular subtype should be recommended as one of the selection criteria for APBI.

Material and methods
157 early-stage breast cancers patients, treated with APBI using multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy with ≥ 6 months follow-up were included. Molecular subtype was assigned based on estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR), Her2neu and tumor grade. Patients were stratified into ASTRO and GEC-ESTRO risk groups, as per updated ASTRO consensus statement (CS) and GEC-ESTRO recommendation, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the time to event data of clinical outcomes.

Results
With a median follow-up of 35 months, local control (LC) and locoregional control (LRC) were not significantly different among the different molecular subtypes (p = 0.19, p = 0.41, respectively). None of the APBI guidelines predicted risk of local or locoregional recurrence. Re-analyzing the data by replacing ER status with molecular subtype in the ASTRO-CS did not show any significant difference in LC/LRC across the various categories. Her2neu subtype was associated with significantly lower disease-free survival, cause specific survival, and overall survival than the luminal subtypes.

Conclusions
None of the mentioned APBI guidelines predicted local or locoregional recurrence risk in our study population. Additional follow-up will be needed to recommend inclusion of molecular subtype (or at least HER2 receptor status) in the patient selection criteria for APBI.

keywords:

Should molecular subtype be recommended as one of the selection criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation? Preliminary results from an Asian cohort

Tabassum Wadasadawala , Monidipa Mondal , Siji Nojin Paul , Vani Parmar , Nita Nair , Tanuja Shet , Sangeeta Desai , Sudeep Gupta , Rajiv Sarin

accelerated partial breast irradiation, breast cancer, multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy

Tabassum Wadasadawala

,

Monidipa Mondal

,

Siji Nojin Paul

,

Vani Parmar

,

Nita Nair

,

Tanuja Shet

,

Sangeeta Desai

,

Sudeep Gupta

,

Rajiv Sarin