eISSN: 1731-2531
ISSN: 1642-5758
Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2024
vol. 56
 
Share:
Share:
Review article

Superior vena cava collapsibility index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Tomasz Królicki
1
,
Maciej Molsa
1
,
Andrzej Tukiendorf
2
,
Ryszard Gawda
1
,
Tomasz Czarnik
1

  1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Poland
  2. Institute of Health Sciences, University of Opole, Poland
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2024; 56, 3: 169–176
Online publish date: 2024/08/30
Article files
- Superior vena cava.pdf  [0.16 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Messmer AS, Zingg C, Müller M, Gerber JL, Schefold JC, Pfortmueller CA. Fluid overload and mortality in adult critical care patients – a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Care Med 2020; 48: 1862-1870. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004617.
2. Zhang L, Chen Z, Diao Y, Yang Y, Fu P. Associations of fluid overload with mortality and kidney recovery in patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care 2015; 30: 860.e7-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.03.025.
3. Jozwiak M, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6: 352. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.05.03.
4. Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42: 1935-1947. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-4134-1.
5. Xu Y, Guo J, Wu Q, Chen J. Efficacy of using tidal volume challenge to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation reduced in low tidal volume ventilated critically ill patients with decreased respiratory system compliance. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22: 137. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01676-8.
6. Charbonneau H, Riu B, Faron M, Mari A, Kurrek MM, Ruiz J, et al. Predicting preload responsiveness using simultaneous recordings of inferior and superior vena cavae diameters. Crit Care 2014; 18: 473. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-014-0473-5.
7. Vignon P, Repessé X, Begot E, Léger J, Jacob C, Bouferrache K, et al. Comparison of echocardiographic indices used to predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 1022-1032. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0844OC.
8. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
9. Yang B, Mallett S, Takwoingi Y, Davenport CF, Hyde CJ, Whiting PF, et al. QUADAS-C: a tool for assessing risk of bias in comparative diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174: 1592-1599. DOI: 10.7326/M21-2234.
10. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.
11. Gatsonis C, Paliwal P. Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening test accuracy evaluations: methodologic primer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 271-281. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0226.
12. Cheng Z, Yang QQ, Zhu P, Feng JY, Zhang XB, Zhao ZB. Transesophageal echocardiographic measurements of the superior vena cava for predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing invasive positive pressure ventilation. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38: 1519-1525. DOI: 10.1002/jum.14839.
13. Li Y, Jiang L, Wang L, Dou D, Feng Y. Evaluation of fluid responsiveness with dynamic superior vena cava collapsibility index in mechanically ventilated patients. Perioper Med (Lond) 2023; 12: 10. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-023-00298-z.
14. Hrishi A, Sethuraman M, Menon G. Quest for the holy grail: assessment of echo-derived dynamic parameters as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Ann Card Anaesth 2018; 21: 243-248. DOI: 10.4103/aca.ACA_141_17.
15. Upadhyay V, Malviya D, Nath S, Tripathi M, Jha A. Comparison of superior vena cava and inferior vena cava diameter changes by echocardiography in predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Essays Res 2020; 14: 441-447. DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_1_21.
16. Ma Q, Ji J, Shi X, Lu Z, Xu L, Hao J, et al. Comparison of superior and inferior vena cava diameter variation measured with transthoracic echocardiography to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients after abdominal surgery. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22: 150. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01692-8.
17. Bubenek-Turconi ŞI, Hendy A, Băilă S, Drăgan A, Chioncel O, Văleanu L, et al. The value of a superior vena cava collapsibility index measured with a miniaturized transoesophageal monoplane continuous echocardiography probe to predict fluid responsiveness compared to stroke volume variations in open major vascular surgery: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Monit Comput 2020; 34: 491-499. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00346-4.
18. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, Peyrouset O, Page B, Beauchet A, et al. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 1734-1739. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-004-2361-y.
19. Alvarado Sánchez JI, Caicedo Ruiz JD, Diaztagle Fernández JJ, Cruz Martínez LE, Carreño Hernández FL, Santacruz Herrera CA, et al. Variables influencing the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2023; 27: 361. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04629-w.
20. Messina A, Dell’Anna A, Baggiani M, Torrini F, Maresca GM, Bennett V, et al. Functional hemodynamic tests: a systematic review and a metanalysis on the reliability of the end-expiratory occlusion test and of the mini-fluid challenge in predicting fluid responsiveness. Crit Care 2019; 23: 264. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2545-z.
21. Deeks J, Bossuyt PM, Takwoingi Y, Leeflang MM (eds.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Version 2.0. Cochrane; 2023.
22. Dinnes J, Mallett S, Hopewell S, Roderick PJ, Deeks JJ. The Moses-Littenberg meta-analytical method generates systematic differences in test accuracy compared to hierarchical meta-analytical models. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 80: 77-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.011.
23. Davies SJ, Minhas S, Wilson RJT, Yates D, Howell SJ. Comparison of stroke volume and fluid responsiveness measurements in commonly used technologies for goal-directed therapy. J Clin Anesth 2013; 25: 466-474. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.04.010.
24. Lahner D, Kabon B, Marschalek C, Chiari A, Pestel G, Kaider A, et al. Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 346-351. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aep200.
25. Nordström J, Hällsjö-Sander C, Shore R, Björne H. Stroke volume optimization in elective bowel surgery: a comparison between pulse power wave analysis (LiDCOrapid) and oesophageal Doppler (CardioQ). Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 374-380. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes399.
26. Vignon P. Hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients using echocardiography Doppler. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11: 227-234. DOI: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000159946.89658.51.
27. Compton FD, Zukunft B, Hoffmann C, Zidek W, Schaefer JH. Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (FlotracTM/VigileoTM) in haemodynamically unstable patients. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 451-456. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem409.
28. Ramalingam G, Choi SW, Agarwal S, Kunst G, Gill R, Fletcher SN, et al. Complications related to peri-operative transoesophageal echocardiography – a one-year prospective national audit by the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care. Anaesthesia 2020; 75: 21-26. DOI: 10.1111/anae.14734.
29. Belda FJ, Aguilar G, Teboul JL, Pestaña D, Redondo FJ, Malbrain M, et al. Complications related to less-invasive haemodynamic monitoring. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 482-486. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq377.
30. Kallmeyer IJ, Collard CD, Fox JA, Body SC, Shernan SK. The safety of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography: a case series of 7200 cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1126-30. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200105000-00009.
31. Monnet X, Shi R, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new? Ann Intensive Care 2022; 12: 46. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8.
32. American Society of Anesthesiologists and Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force on Transesophageal Echocardiography. Practice guidelines for perioperative transesophageal echocardiography. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force on Transesophageal Echocardiography. Anesthesiology 2010; 112: 1048-1096. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c51e90.
33. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Transpulmonary thermodilution: advantages and limits. Crit Care 2017; 21: 147. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1739-5.
34. Gavelli F, Shi R, Teboul JL, Azzolina D, Monnet X. The end-expiratory occlusion test for detecting preload responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care 2020; 10: 65. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00682-8.
35. Alvarado Sánchez JI, Caicedo Ruiz JD, Diaztagle Fernández JJ, Amaya Zuñiga WF, Ospina-Tascón GA, Cruz Martínez LE. Predictors of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care 2021; 11: 28. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00817-5.
36. Maeda T, Hattori K, Sumiyoshi M, Kanazawa H, Ohnishi Y. Accuracy and trending ability of the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo SystemTM in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J Anesth 2018; 32: 387-393. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-018-2491-y.
37. Hattori K, Maeda T, Masubuchi T, Yoshikawa A, Ebuchi K, Morishima K, et al. Accuracy and trending ability of the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system in patients with low cardiac index. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 31: 99-104. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.06.016.
38. Su BC, Tsai YF, Chen CY, Yu HP, Yang MW, Lee WC, et al. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing liver transplantation: validity of a third-generation device. Transplant Proc 2012; 44: 424-428. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.036.
39. Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: A comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 337-342. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem177.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.