eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2014
vol. 9
 
Share:
Share:
Case report

The DIAMOND system in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in an obese patient

Jarosław Kozakowski
,
Harold E. Lebovitz
,
Adam Kiciak
,
Wojciech Zgliczyński
,
Wiesław Tarnowski

Videosurgery Miniinv 2014; 9 (4): 627–631
Online publish date: 2014/10/07
Article file
- the diamond.pdf  [0.12 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Obesity has reached epidemic proportions, with an estimated 1.7 billion people worldwide classified as either overweight or obese [1]. As obesity is clearly associated with an increased risk for diabetes, this disease affects nearly 346 million people worldwide [2]. Unfortunately, the majority of antidiabetic medications are of limited efficacy. Moreover, patient compliance is one of the main limiting factors of effective blood glucose control [3]. For these reasons new therapies are still looked for.
Control of food intake is a crucial component of energy balance [4, 5]. During eating some of the neurons in the stomach are activated by stretch receptors and generate electrical impulses with subsequent detectable changes in muscle function. These small electromechanical changes mainly during the initiation of food intake are responsible for gastric contractility. This increase in the force of gastric contractions relating to stomach distension increases vagal afferent activity. Impulses are sent to the nucleus tractus solitarius and area postrema, generating the sensation of satiety [6]. In the first studies in animals, implantation of gastric leads enabled detection of these signals generated at the beginning of food intake [7, 8]. The DIAMOND system (Metacure, Ltd, Orangeburg, USA) – a novel method of therapy of type 2 diabetes associated with obesity based on new technology, Gastric Contractility Modulation (GCM) – recognizes natural electrical activity of the stomach and automatically applies nonexcitatory electrical stimulation treatment during eating, with subsequent modulation of signals transmitted by the vagus nerve to the regulatory centers in the brain, in order to provoke an early response of the gut typical of a full meal. In recent clinical trials the system proved its efficacy and safety [9–14].

Case report

A 47-year-old obese women (LGG) with type 2 dia­betes came to our outpatient clinic willing to be treated under the prospective, randomized “The DIAMOND™ for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Single Blind Cross Over Study”. Her history was elicited. Obesity developed in childhood, from 1974. Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed in 2004. Additionally, she was hypertensive from 2007 and her history included varicose veins in the legs diagnosed in 2002, surgery of metrorrhagia also in 2002, and cholecystectomy via laparoscopy because of a biliary stone in 2004. The patient has attempted to achieve a diabetic diet and has taken medicines: glimepiride 4 mg q.d., metformin 850 mg t.i.d., ramipril 5 mg q.d. and betaxolol 10 mg q.d. Physical examination revealed both central and peripheral type of obesity. Body weight was 91.7 kg, waist circumference 112.6 cm, and body mass index (BMI) 32.0 kg/m2. No significant abnormalities in the respiratory and cardiovascular system (except varicosed superficial leg veins) were found. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was 9.3% and fasting serum glucose level was 188 mg/dl. The patient was enrolled in the study. Three bipolar leads were laparoscopically implanted in the subserosa of the gastric wall (Figure 1). The leads were connected with the device located in the subcutaneous pocket in the left subcostal region of the abdomen (Photo 1).
According to the study protocol 15 control visits in the next 48-week follow-up (period 1 and period 2) were performed (Figure 2).
Each visit included eliciting of history since the former visit and physical examination with anthropometric measurements together with assessment of vital systems. Blood samples were taken for estimation of HbA1c and glucose levels as well as for other enzymatic, biochemical and hormonal indices indicated in the protocol. At each visit parameters from the device – battery voltage, eat rate episode and impedance, eat detect, antrum anterior and posterior impedance, and fundus impedance – were read with a special computer program.
During the first 6 months of the treatment (first period) the device was switched on. In this period an impressive gradual decrease in fasting glucose and HbA1c levels (of 3.3%) and in homeostatic model of assessment (HOMA) was observed accompanied by a reduction of body weight (–9.1 kg) and waist circumference (–16.0 cm). Additionally, decreases in leptin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and triglyceride levels as well as an increase in HDL-cholesterol levels were found (Table I). After the first months of treatment the dose of glimepiride could be reduced from 4 mg to 3 mg, after 19 weeks to 2 mg, after 25 weeks to 1 mg, and after 24 weeks it could be completely discontinued. Regarding adverse events (AE), the patient experienced one episode of hypoglycemia with a drop of blood glucose to 58 mg/dl. No other serious AE occurred.
In the next 6 months (second period), the device was switched off, according to the study protocol. This time fasting glucose and HbA1c levels, and in turn the HOMA index, rose gradually. Meanwhile, body weight and waist circumference did not change significantly. The HsCRP, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, but also HDL cholesterol increased (Table II). No significant AE, including hypoglycemic episodes, were seen.
After completing period 1 and 2 of the study, the subject decided to continue treatment for the next weeks, and the follow-up is ongoing.

Discussion

The improvement in glucose metabolism parameters observed in our patient during the study was rather gradual and not very rapid. It should be considered as beneficial, as in a randomized study of 10 251 patients (mean age: 62.2 years) intensive therapy to target normal glycated hemoglobin levels for 3.5 years increased mortality and did not significantly reduce major cardiovascular events [15]. These findings identified a previously unrecognized harm of intensive glucose lowering in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes.
It is worth paying attention to normal patient baseline triglyceride levels. Analysis of 40 subjects who had undergone detailed longitudinal studies for 12 months revealed that in patients with normal fasting plasma triglycerides the HbA1c decrease was clearly more significant, and they lost more weight than did patients with hypertriglyceridemia. This may suggest the existence of a triglyceride lipotoxic mechanism that interferes with gastric/neural mediated pathways that can regulate glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. It seems in preliminary observations of gastric electric stimulation that method efficacy is strongly dependent on this parameter, and in fact there is an inverse relationship between serum fasting triglyceride levels at baseline and decrease in HbA1c during treatment [14]. In the discussion of this finding, a direct or indirect impact of elevated serum levels of triglycerides (i.e. above 150 ng/ml) to inhibit the glycemic effect of gastric stimulation is considered. In animal studies an intestine-brain-liver axis was found by which lipids in the upper intestine stimulate neural transmission to the hindbrain, and therefore, after transformation is conducted through vagus nerve branches, hepatic glucose production is suppressed [16]. Further prospective studies should elucidate the mechanism of the relationship between initial triglyceride levels and hypoglycemic efficacy of gastric electrical stimulation.

Conclusions

This novel method of treatment intended for type 2 diabetes patients with overweight/obesity may become an important alternative to the use of incretins or insulin. It may also substitute for bariatric surgery in obese patients who are unwilling to undergo a vast and anatomically irreversible operation or do not meet all required criteria to justify these procedures.

Acknowledgments

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interests: H. E. Lebovitz has received travel reimbursements and honoraria from Metacure Inc. for attending several conferences and chairing its Senior Medical Advisory Committee. He holds stock options for Metacure Inc. J. Kozakowski, A. Kiciak, W. Tarnowski and W. Zgliczyński participated in MetaCure Inc. sponsored study No MC CP TAN2007-032.

References

1. World Health Organization 2008. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Available at: http://www.who.diet.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/facts/obesity/en
2. World Health Organization 2011 World Health Organization: diabetes facts sheet. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs312/en/index.html
3. Koro CE, Bowlin SJ, Bourgeois N, Fedder DO. Glycemic control from 1998 to 2000 among U.S. adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a preliminary report. Diabetes Care 2007; 27: 17-20.
4. Morton GJ, Cummings DE, Baskin DG, Schwartz MW. Central nervous system control of food intake and body weight. Nature 2006; 443: 289-95.
5. Cummings DE, Overduin J. Gastrointestinal regulation of food intake. J Clin Invest 2007; 117: 13-23.
6. Kentish S, Li H, Philp LK, et al. Diet-induced adaptation of vagal afferent function. J Physiol 2012; 590: 209-21.
7. Sanmiguel CP, Aviv R, Policker S, et al. Association between gastric electromechanical activity and satiation in dogs. Obesity 2007; 15: 2958-63.
8. Aviv R, Sanmiguel CP, Kliger A, et al. The use of gastric electrical signals for algorithm for automatic eating detection in dogs. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2008; 20: 369-76.
9. Bohdjalian A, Prager G, Aviv R, et al. One-year experience with DIAMOND™: a new surgical approach to treat morbid obesity. Obes Surg 2006; 5: 627-34.
10. Policker S, Lu H, Aviv R, et al. Electrical stimulation of the gut for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: the role of automatic eating detection. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2008; 2: 906-12.
11. Bohdjalian A, Prager G, Rosak C, et al. Improvement in glycemic control in morbidly obese type 2 diabetic subjects by gastric stimulation. Obes Surg 2009; 19: 1221-7.
12. Sanmiguel CP, Conklin JL, Cunneen SA, et al. Gastric electrical stimulation with the DIAMOND™ System in obese type 2 diabetes patients: effect on weight and glycemic control. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009; 3: 964-70.
13. Bohdjalian A, Ludvik B, Guerci B, et al. Improvement in glycemic control by gastric electrical stimulation (DIAMOND™) in overweight subjects with type 2 diabetes. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1955-60.
14. Lebovitz HE, Ludvik B, Yaniv I, et al.; the Metacure investigator group. Fasting plasma triglycerides predict the glycemic response to treatment of type 2 diabetes by gastric electrical stimulation. A novel lipoxicity paradigm. Diabet Med 2013; 30: 687-93.
15. Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group, Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2545-59.
16. Wang PYT, Caspi L, Larn CKL, et al. Upper intestinal lipids trigger a gut-brain-liver axis to regulate glucose production. Nature 2008; 452: 1012-6.

Received: 10.09.2014, accepted: 13.09.2014.
Copyright: © 2014 Fundacja Videochirurgii This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
  
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.