eISSN: 2449-8238
ISSN: 2392-1099
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2022
vol. 8
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

The TM6SF2 variant as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma development in chronic liver disease patients

Gamal Y. S. Raia
1
,
Eman Abdelsameea
1
,
Dalia Hamdy Twfic Taie
1
,
Omar Elshaarawy
1
,
Noha Rabie Bayomy
2
,
Rasha G Mostafa
2
,
Aml Abd Alhamid Alsharnoby
1
,
Karema Abdelhady Diab
1

  1. National Liver Institute, Egypt
  2. Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
Clin Exp HEPATOL 2022; 8, 3: 211-218
Online publish date: 2022/09/15
Article file
- The TM6SF2.pdf  [0.20 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide and is highly prevalent in Egypt. Unfortunately, most HCC patients in Egypt are first diagnosed in the intermediate or advanced stages [1]. For early diagnosis and to reduce HCC-related mortality, new HCC diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers are crucial [2]. Multiple risk factors are correlated with HCC, including alcohol abuse, hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, aflatoxin exposure, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and metabolic diseases [2].

The transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2) gene is located on chromosome 19 and encodes a protein composed of 351 amino acids [3]. Expression pattern analysis has shown that TM6SF2 is mainly expressed in the kidney, small intestine and liver, all of which are tightly associated with lipid metabolism; the expression levels of TM6SF2 are lower in most other tissues [3]. TM6SF2 gene E167K variant (rs58542926) was identified in an exome-wide association study as a non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. SNPs can influence gene expression, protein function and disease susceptibility [5]. The E167K variant helps regulate liver fat metabolism, influencing triglyceride secretion and hepatic lipid droplet content, and has been associated with increased hepatocytic triglyceride content, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular risk, advanced hepatic fibrosis, and cirrhosis [4]. We determined the association between the TM6SF2 gene SNP rs58542926 and HCC occurrence and progression in Egyptian CLD patients to evaluate its utility as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of HCC.

Material and methods

The study was conducted in the Clinical Pathology and Hepatology and Gastroenterology Departments at the National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Egypt, between January 2019 and March 2020. A total of 120 subjects were enrolled in this case-control study, including 40 patients with HCC and 40 patients with CLD with no radiological evidence of HCC. Infections associated with hepatitis types C or B were the cause of chronic liver disease in this group in addition to 40 healthy age- and sex-matched individuals as a control group, with no previous history of liver or malignant diseases and negative for hepatitis viral markers. Patients with HCC were diagnosed according to definitive criteria detected by triphasic computed tomography with contrast (which showed arterial enhancement and delayed venous washout). Patients were excluded if they had been diagnosed with an inflammatory disease, hematological malignancy, and cancer of any organ other than the liver. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of the National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Egypt. Informed consent was collected from all participants after receiving information about the study.

Relevant clinical data were collected from all participants. Laboratory blood analyses included those for liver and renal function. The Cobas 6000 autoanalyser (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) was used to determine aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, serum albumin, creatinine and urea. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP, Cobas e411 immunoassay analyzer, Roche Diagnostics, Germany), prothrombin time (Coagulometer CA-1500, Siemens, Germany), and hepatitis serology (HBsAg and HCVAb) (Cobas e411 immunoassay analyzer, Roche Diagnostics, Germany) were also assessed.

SNP genotyping for the TM6SF2 rs58542926 polymorphism was performed using a real-time PCR assay (Applied Biosystems, USA). Total DNA was extracted from EDTA-treated blood samples using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lithuania).

After ethanol precipitation, the DNA was purified and dissolved in double-distilled water and stored at –20°C until analysis [6]. The TM6SF2 gene polymorphism (rs58542926) was genotyped by real-time PCR fluorescence detection on an ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR system using fluorescence-labeled probes. Context Sequence [VIC/FAM]: The PCR primers (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were as follows: forward 5’GTGAGGAAGAAGGCAGGCCTGATCT3’ and reverse 5’GGAGCTGTATTTGCCTTCCATGGTG3’.

Preparation of solution reaction (Total volume 20 µl): [Master Mix (2X) 10 µl, TaqMan assay 20 k 0.5 µl, Template DNA 5 µl, Water and nuclease-free 4.5 µl]. PCR cycling conditions were 95°C for 10 min, then 40 cycles of amplification of 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 15 s.

Automatic or manual allele calls were marked. The software analyzed the before and after fluorescence levels and calculated normalized dye fluorescence (ΔRn) as a function of cycle number for Allele1 (wild-type) or Allele2 (mutant). Based on this number (the relative number of the possible outcomes), the software makes an automatic call of Allele1 (homozygous 1/1), Allele2 (homozygous 2/2), or heterozygous (1/2).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the data was conducted using SPSS version 22 (SPSS Inc., USA). Data were analyzed descriptively and quantitatively using a χ2 test, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, Fisher’s exact test, odds ratio (OR), and confidence interval (CI) test. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age (p = 0.06) or gender (p = 0.750) (Table 1). There were significant differences between the three groups regarding liver cirrhosis, ascites, portal vein thrombosis and Child-Pugh score (p ≤ 0.001), but no significant differences regarding smoking habits (p = 0.39) and diagnosed diabetes mellitus (p = 0.55) (Table 2). Blood concentrations of AST, ALT, GGT, ALP, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, serum albumin, creatinine, urea, AFP and international normalized ratio (INR) were significantly different between the groups (p ≤ 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 1

Sociodemographic data of the studied groups

ParameterGroup I (n= 40)Group II (n= 40)Group III (n= 40)p
n%n%n%
Gender
Male3075.02972.52767.50.750
Female1025.01127.51332.5
Age (years)
Min.-Max.44.0-68.040.0-68.042.0-60.00.06
Mean ±SD55.23 ±7.1352.40 ±7.1051.92 ±5.31

[i] χ2 – chi-square test, F – F for ANOVA test

[ii] p – p value for comparing between the studied groups

[iii] Group I: Patients with HCC, Group II: Patients with chronic hepatic disease, Group III: Control

Table 2

Comparison between the two studied groups according to risk factors

ParameterGroup I (n= 40)Group II (n= 40)χ2p
n%n%
Smoking
No2255.02665.00.8330.361
Yes1845.01435.0
Diabetes mellitus
No2255.02255.00.01.000
Yes1845.01845.5
Splenomegaly
No820.02665.016.573*< 0.001*
Yes3280.01435.0
Cirrhotic
No00.03075.048.0*< 0.001*
Yes40100.01025.0
PVT
No2460.040100.020.0*< 0.001*
Yes1640.000.0

χ2 – chi-square test

p – p value for comparing between the studied groups

* Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05

Group I: Patients with HCC, Group II: Patients with chronic hepatic disease

Table 3

Comparison between the different studied groups according to laboratory data

Group I (n= 40)Group II (n= 40)Group III (n = 40)pSig. bet. groups
n%n%n%p1p2p3
Albumin (g/dl)
Min.-Max.2.0-4.603.80-4.804.30-4.90< 0.001*< 0.001*< 0.001*< 0.001*
Mean ±SD3.34 ±0.594.17 ±0.294.58 ±0.16
TP (g/dl)
Min.-Max.5.0-7.106.0-7.105.80-7.40< 0.001*< 0.001*< 0.001*0.029*
Mean ±SD5.73 ±0.536.54 ±0.366.79 ±0.39
ALP (μ/l)
Min.-Max.81.0-165.061.0-111.035.0-61.0< 0.001*< 0.001*< 0.001*< 0.001*
Mean ±SD114.20 ±21.5787.55 ±16.1645.20 ±7.77
γ-GT (mg/dl)
Min.-Max.78.0-160.010.0-41.013.0-35.0< 0.001*< 0.001*< 0.001*0.018*
Median (IQR)95.0 (90.50-113.0)30.50 (23.5-36.5)23.50 (22.0-25.0)
AST (μ/l)
Min.-Max.25.0-238.018.0-135.018.0-30.0< 0.001*< 0.001*< 0.001*0.003*
Median (IQR)74.0 (42.5-102.5)37.0 (29.0-67.0)21.50 (20.0-24.0)
ALT (μ/l)
Min.-Max.11.0-170.020.0-173.020.0-34.0< 0.001*< 0.001*< 0.001*0.015*
Median (IQR)78.0 (46.5-115.0)43.0 (27.5-85.0)26.0 (24.0-29.5)
Total bilirubin (mg/dl)
Min.-Max.0.50-3.00.30-1.200.30-0.75< 0.001*< 0.001*< 0.001*0.010*
Median (IQR)1.04 (0.75-1.40)0.60 (0.40-0.85)0.50 (0.40-0.60)
Direct bilirubin (mg/dl)
Min.-Max.0.10-2.00.10-1.100.10-0.30< 0.001*< 0.001*< 0.001*0.001*
Median (IQR)0.50 (030-0.80)0.30 (0.20-0.40)0.15 (0.10-0.19)
PT
Min.-Max.9.0-14.5011.0-15.5011.0-14.0< 0.001*< 0.001*0.1460.002*
Median (IQR)11.75 (10.1-13.35)14.0 (12.0-14.5)12.0 (12.0-12.60)
INR
Min.-Max.1.0-1.181.0-1.301.0-1.12< 0.001*0.003*0.068< 0.001*
Median (IQR)1.0 (1.0-1.05)1.12 (1.0-1.18)1.0 (1.0-1.0)
AFP (ng/ml)
Min.-Max.16.10-2650.02.0-18.02.0-5.0< 0.001*< 0.001*< 0.001*0.075
Median (IQR)510.0 (75.5-769.5)4.0 (3.0-8.15)3.0 (3.0-4.0)
Urea (mg/dl)
Min.-Max.15.0-80.015.0-41.017.0-37.0< 0.001*< 0.001*< 0.001*0.336
Median (IQR)38.0 (29.5-50.5)26.0 (21.0-35.0)24.0 (21.5-30.5)
Creatinine (mg/dl)
Min.-Max.0.40-1.300.40-1.020.50-1.00.002*0.002*0.013*0.848
Mean ±SD0.87 ±0.270.72 ±0.160.75 ±0.13

AST – aspartate aminotransferase, ALT – alanine aminotransferase, ALP – alkaline phosphatase, γ-GT – γ-glutamyltransferase, TP – total protein, INR – international normalized ratio

χ2– chi-square test, F – F for ANOVA test, Pairwise comparison between each 2 groups was done using a post hoc test (Tukey), H – H for Kruskal-Wallis test, pairwise comparison between each 2 groups was done using a post hoc test (Dunn’s test for multiple comparisons)

pp value for comparing between the studied groups, p1 – value for comparing between HCC and liver cirrhosis, p2 – value for comparing between HCC and control, p3 – value for comparing between liver cirrhosis and control

* Statistically significant at p < 0.05

The frequency distributions of the different genotypes for the TM6SF2 polymorphism were significantly different between HCC patients and the other groups (Table 4). HCC patients had a higher incidence of TT and TC genotypes than CLD patients and healthy controls (p = 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively). A statistically higher incidence of the T allele was observed in HCC than in the CLD and healthy control groups (p < 0.001) (Table 4, Fig. 1).

Table 4

Comparison of genotype and allele frequencies of rs58542926 between HCC patients, CLD and control group

Polymorphism dataGroup I (n = 40)Group II (n = 40)Group III (n = 40)PSignificance between groups
n%n%n%I vs. III vs. IIIII vs. III
Additive genetic model
CC1230.02870.03895.0MCp< 0.001*0.001*MCp< 0.001*MCp 0.008*
CT2050.01025.025.0
TT820.025.000.0
OR (95% CI)*I and II CC reference CT: 4.67 [1.67-12.90] TT: 9.33 [1.72-50.61]*I and III CC reference CT: 31.68 [6.45-155.6] TT: –
Recessive genetic model
CT + CC3280.03895.040100.0MCp= 0.005*0.043*FEp= 0.005*FEp= 0.494
TT820.025.000.0
OR (95%CI)*I and II 4.75 [0.94-23.98]*I and III –
Dominant genetic model
CC1230.02870.03895.0MCp< 0.001*< 0.001*< 0.001*0.003*
CT + TT2870.01230.025.0
OR (95%CI)*I and II 5.44 (2.09-14.17)*I and III 44.33 (9.18-214.06)
Alleles
C4455.06682.57897.5< 0.001*0.001*< 0.001*0.006*
T3645.01417.522.5
OR (95% CI)*I and II 3.86 (1.87-7.97)*I and III 31.909 (7.33-138.93)
HWEp0.87
χ20.026

HWE – p value for Hardy-Weinberg, χ2 – chi-square test, MC – Monte Carlo

pp value for comparing between the studied groups, FE – Fisher exact

OR – odds ratio, CI – confidence interval, LL – lower limit, UL – upper limit

* Statistically significant at p < 0.05

Fig. 1

Comparison between the studied groups according to polymorphism rs58542926

/f/fulltexts/CEH/47759/CEH-8-47759-g001_min.jpg

In evaluating the risk of HCC according to TM6SF2 genotype, we identified significantly higher TC and TT genotype frequencies in the HCC group (50% and 20%, respectively) than in the other groups (Table 4, Fig. 1). In contrast, the CC genotype frequency was significantly higher in the control group (95%) than in the other groups (p < 0.001).

In the additive genetic model, CLD patients with the CT genotype had a significantly higher risk of HCC development (OR = 4.67, 95% CI: 1.67-12.90). Individuals carrying the TT genotype had a significantly increased risk of HCC (OR = 9.33, 95% CI: 1.72-50.61) (Table 4, Fig. 1). Furthermore, HCC patients had a significantly higher frequency (p < 0.001) of the T allele (45.0%) than CLD and control groups (17.5% and 2.5%, respectively).

The dominant genetic model combination of TC and TT genotypes was significantly greater in the HCC group (70.0%) than in the CLD and control groups (30% and 5%, respectively; p < 0.001). Also, CLD patients carrying the T allele (TC + TT) had a 5.44-fold increased risk for HCC development (OR = 5.44, 95% CI: 2.09-14.17) (Table 4, Fig. 1).

In the control group, the study results were in accordance with the Hardy-Weinberg law of disequilibrium (χ2 = 0.026, p = 0.87).

Univariate analysis of potential HCC risk factors indicated that age and presence of the T allele (CT + TT) were associated significantly with a higher risk of HCC than in the control group (OR = 1.088, 95% CI: 1.011-1.171 and p = 0.025; OR = 44.333, 95% CI: 9.182- 214.062 and p < 0.001, respectively) (Table 5). Univariate analysis of potential HCC risk factors of HCC against CLD indicated that splenomegaly and T allele in the homozygous and heterozygous genotypes (CT + TT) were associated significantly with an increased risk of HCC against CLD (OR = 7.429, 95% CI: 2.703-20.419 and p < 0.001; OR = 5.444, 95% CI: 2.092-14.168 and p = 0.001, respectively) (Table 6).

Table 5

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for the parameters affecting the HCC group compared to the control

ParameterUnivariateMultivariate#
pOR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)
Gender (male)0.4600.692 (0.261-1.835)
Age (years)0.025*1.088 (1.011-1.171)0.1541.078 (0.972-1.194)
Smoking
Diabetes mellitus
Splenomegaly
Cirrhotic
rs58542926 (CT + TT)< 0.001*44.333 (9.182-214.062)< 0.001*42.359 (8.560-209.598)

OR – odds ratio, CI – confidence interval, LL – lower limit, UL – upper limit

# All variables with p < 0.05 were included in the multivariate analysis

* Statistically significant at p < 0.05

Table 6

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for the parameters affecting the HCC group (n = 40) compared to the chronic liver disease group (n = 40)

ParameterUnivariateMultivariate#
pOR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)
Gender (male)0.7990.879 (0.324-2.381)
Age (years)0.0821.058 (0.993-1.128)
Smoking0.3621.519 (0.618-3.738)
Diabetes mellitus1.0001.0 (0.414-2.413)
Splenomegaly< 0.001*7.429 (2.703-20.419)0.003*5.131 (1.763-14.937)
Cirrhotic0.998
rs58542926 (CT + TT)0.001*5.444 (2.092-14.168)0.021*3.409 (1.203-9.660)

OR – odds ratio, CI – confidence interval, LL – lower limit, UL – upper limit

# All variables with p < 0.05 were included in the multivariate analysis

* Statistically significant at p < 0.05

Multivariate analysis showed that the T allele in homozygous and heterozygous forms (CT + TT) was associated significantly with a higher risk of HCC than the control group (OR = 42.359, 95% CI: 8.560-209.598 and p < 0.001) (Table 5). Multivariate analysis conducted on potential risk factors of HCC against CLD also showed that splenomegaly and the presence of the T allele in homozygous and heterozygous forms (CT + TT) were associated significantly with an increased risk of HCC against CLD (respectively, OR = 5.131, 95% CI: 1.763-14.937 and p = 0.003; OR = 3.409, 95% CI: 1.203-9.660 and p = 0.021) (Table 6).

Discussion

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common primary malignancy of the liver and the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. The incidence of HCC is increasing, presenting a major global health challenge [7]. In Egypt, HCC is the second most common cancer in men and the sixth most common cancer in women [8]. Furthermore, it is associated with a low 5-year survival rate and an increased mortality rate [9].

The mean age (±SD) of HCC patients in our study was 55.23 ±7.13 years. These results are similar to those of Mohammed et al. [10], who studied an HCC patient cohort with a mean age of 55.4 ±9.757 years, and Sang-Wook et al. [11], who studied an HCC cohort with a mean age of 53.0 ±9.7 years. However, Fotos et al. [12] found that HCC is more frequent in patients ≥ 65 years of age.

The mean age of patients with CLD was 52.40 ±7.10 years. This was consistent with Banait et al. [13], who reported that CLD was more frequent in patients ≥ 50 years. In contrast, Abdelmenan et al. [14] found that the mean age of CLD patients was between 30 to 40 years.

We found a statistically significant difference between HCC patients and the other two groups in values of AST, ALT, ALP, GGT, AFP, albumin, total and direct bilirubin and INR. These results are consistent with Zekri et al. [15], who found a statistically significant difference between the HCC patient group and control group in AST, ALT, albumin, bilirubin and INR values. Similarly, Redwan [16] obtained the same result. In contrast, Sarwar et al. [17] found no significant difference in serum albumin and INR between the HCC group and the non-HCC group.

The TM6SF2 gene E167K variant (rs58542926) is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, a disease frequently associated with metabolic disorders and fat deposition in liver cells. Some studies have demonstrated that this variant increases the risk of developing liver fibrosis and steatohepatitis [18]. Furthermore, it has emerged as a predictor of fibrosis progression and hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence [18].

The TM6SF2 E167K variant features a C-to-T substitution at nucleotide 499, encoding a glutamate-to-lysine change at codon 167, resulting in a misfolded protein, accelerated protein degradation and reduced protein levels in the body [19].

The present study was designed to evaluate the role of rs58542926 and the development of HCC in an Egyptian cohort. Multiple studies have focused on the role of a common non-synonymous polymorphism in TM6SF2 (rs58542926, E167K) in lipid metabolism and chronic liver disease, and multiple studies have focused on the role of the TM6SF2 rs58542926 variant in chronic liver disease and HCC.

Genotyping will permit more precise HCC risk stratification of patients with chronic liver diseases, and genotype-guided screening algorithms would optimize patient care [20]. Assessing genetic risk factors associated with the development of HCC may allow for earlier diagnosis of malignancy and could potentially lead to decreased disease-specific mortality rates.

Current studies have shown that the (TM6SF2) rs5854292 gene polymorphism is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Meanwhile, multiple investigators in China and other countries have conducted many studies to assess the relationship between the TM6SF2 rs5854292 gene polymorphism and liver cancer. Some studies concluded that the TM6SF2 rs5854292 variant was associated with the risk of developing liver cancer [21]. Other studies, however, demonstrated that the presence of the TM6SF2 variant did not appear to be associated with a further increased risk of developing HCC [22].

We found in this study that the genotype distribution among the studied groups was significantly different between HCC patients and the other groups. HCC patients had a higher incidence of TT and TC genotypes than CLD patients and healthy controls. The T allele frequency in HCC patients was higher than in CLD patients and healthy controls.

The TC and TT genotype frequencies were significantly higher in the HCC group (50% and 20%, respectively) than in the other groups, while the CC genotype was significantly higher in the control group 95% than in other groups. The dominant genetic model combination of TC and TT genotypes was statistically significantly higher in the HCC group (70.0%) than in the CLD and control groups (30% and 5%, respectively).

These results were similar to those of the metanalysis of Tang et al. [21], who found that the pooled risk of liver cancer was higher in the TT + CT genotype than in the CC genotype (CC vs. CT + TT, OR = 1.675, 95% CI: 1.413-1.985, p = 0.000).

We found that in the additive genetic model, CLD patients with the CT genotype correlated with an increased risk of HCC development (OR = 4.67, 95% CI: 1.67-12.90). Patients with the TT genotype had a significantly higher risk of HCC (OR = 9.33, 95% CI: 1.72-50.61). This was consistent with the results of Stickel et al. [20] (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.30-2.13, p = 5.13 × 10-5), who used an additive model controlling for sex and age.

In our cohort, HCC patients had a significantly higher frequency of the T allele (45.0%) than the CLD and control groups (17.5% and 2.5%, respectively). Also, in the dominant genetic model, CLD patients carrying the T allele (TC + TT) had an increased risk for HCC development (by 5.44-fold). Our results were similar to the results obtained by Tang et al. [21] and Raksayot et al. [23], who found that patients with the T allele were at increased risk for HCC (OR = 1.621, 95% CI: 1.379-1.905, p = 0.000; and OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.34-3.65, p = 0.002, respectively).

Conclusions

The TM6SF2 gene E167K variant (rs58542926) polymorphism was found to be associated with an increased risk of HCC in our Egyptian cohort. More studies are needed that include larger sample sizes and more ethnic groups. Knowledge of the mechanisms involved in HCC carcinogenesis may help to identify targets for the development of chemoprevention or therapeutic strategies.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to confidential and institutional ethical issues.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank our colleagues in the Department of Laboratory Medicine and the patients in National Liver Institute who helped in this work.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Elshaarawy O, Aman A, Zakaria HM, et al. Outcomes of curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13: 424-439.

2 

Allam MM, Diab KA, Khalil FO, et al. The association between micro-RNA gene polymorphisms and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in Egyptian patients. Arch Med Sci 2021; 18: 62-70.

3 

Zhang X, Liu S, Dong Q, et al. The genetics of clinical liver diseases: insight into the TM6SF2 E167K variant. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2018; 6: 326-331.

4 

Coppola N, Rosa Z, Cirillo G, et al. TM6SF2E167Kvariant is associated with severe steatosis in chronic hepatitis C, regardless of PNPLA3 polymorphism. Liver Int 2015; 35: 1959-1963.

5 

Yang J, Trépo E, Nahon P, et al. PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 variants as risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma across various etiologies and severity of underlying liver diseases. Int J Cancer 2019; 144: 533-544.

6 

Stephen CY, Sze-wah Lin, Kam-ming Lai, et al. An evaluation of the performance of five extraction methods: Chelex® 100, QIAamp® DNA Blood Mini Kit, QIAamp® DNA Investigator Kit, QIA symphony® DNA Investigator® Kit and DNA IQ™. Science & Justice 2015; 55: 200-208.

7 

Puppala S, Patel R, Yap K, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: modern image-guided therapies. Postgrad Med J 2016; 92: 165-171.

8 

Omar A, Abou-Alfa G, Khairy A, et al. Risk factors for developing hepatocellular carcinoma in Egypt. Chin Clin Oncol 2013; 2: 43-51.

9 

Blechacz B, Mishra L. Hepatocellular carcinoma biology. Recent Results Cancer Res 2013; 190: 1-20.

10 

Mohammed KZ, Taher E Attia, Amira Y, et al. Serum galectin-3 levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cirrhosis and chronic viral hepatitis. Egypt J Hospital Med 2018; 70: 132-139.

11 

Sang-Wook Yi, Ja-Sung Cho, Jee-Jeon Yi, et al. Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma by age, sex, and liver disorder status: A prospective cohort study in Korea. Cancer 2018; 124: 2748-2757.

12 

Fotos NV, Ioannis ES, Konstantinos G, et al. Frequency and predisposing factors of epatocellula carcinoma in a hepatology outpatient unit. Health Sci J 2015; 9: 1-5.

13 

Banait S, Badole SM, Jain J, et al. Risk factors for chronic liver disease in population of Central India: a case-control study from rural India. Egypt Liver J 2021; 11: A10.

14 

Abdelmenan S, Banes A, Berhane Y, et al. Etiology of chronic liver disease in ethiopia: a case control study with special reference to viral hepatitis and alcohol. EC Gastroenterol Dig Syst 2018; 5: 120-128.

15 

Zekri A, Youssef A, Bakr Y, et al. Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma co-occurring with hepatitis C virus infection: a mathematical model. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 4168-4182.

16 

Redwan AA. Hepatocellular carcinoma from diagnosis to treatment: 15 years of challenges and modification of resection strategies. Egypt J Surg 2016; 35: 421-432.

17 

Sarwar S, Khan AA, Tarique S. Validity of alpha fetoprotein for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2014; 24: 18-22.

18 

Petta S, Maida M, Grimaudo S, et al. TM6SF2rs58542926 is not associated with steatosis and fibrosis in large cohort of patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C. Liver Int 2016; 36: 198-204.

19 

Luo F, Oldoni F, Das A. TM6SF2: a novel genetic player in nonalcoholic fatty liver and cardiovascular disease. Hepatol Commun 2022; 6: 448-460.

20 

Stickel F, Buch S, Nischalke HD, et al. Genetic variants in PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 predispose to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in individuals with alcohol-related cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 1475-1483.

21 

Tang S, Zhang J, Mei TT, et al. Association of TM6SF2 rs58542926 T/C gene polymorphism with hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2019; 19: 1128.

22 

Liu YL, Reeves HL, Burt AD, et al. TM6SF2 rs58542926 influences hepatic fibrosis progression in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 4309.

23 

Raksayot M, Chuaypen N, Khlaiphuengsin A, et al. Independent and additive effects of PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 polymorphisms on the development of non-B, non-C hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 2019; 54: 427-436.

Copyright: © Clinical and Experimental Hepatology. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.