eISSN: 2081-2841
ISSN: 1689-832X
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Current Issue Archive Supplements Articles in Press Journal Information Aims and Scope Editorial Office Editorial Board Register as Author Register as Reviewer Instructions for Authors Abstracting and indexing Subscription Advertising Information Links
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

2/2018
vol. 10
 
Share:
Share:
Letter to the Editor

Don’t forget the bladder!

Bernard J. Oosterveld
,
Elzbieta M. van der Steen-Banasik
,
Geert A. Smits

J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10, 2: 178
Online publish date: 2018/04/30
Article file
- dont forget.pdf  [0.13 MB]
Get citation
 
 
With a lot of interest, we have read your review paper [1] recently published in the Educational Articles section. You gave a comprehensive overview of the present clinical indications for brachytherapy. These range from the curative treatment of prostate cancer, with a lot of scientific evidence, to the palliative treatments of esophageal cancer and bile duct cancer, on which there are only a small number of papers that describe clinical results. Your work provides a valuable contribution and can be widely used for educational purposes.
However, what we regrettably missed is the subject of brachytherapy of muscle invasive bladder cancer.
This treatment, which is performed in combination with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), is curative and saves the patient’s bladder. Already in the 40’s of the past century, the treatment of 522 patients was reported in two American papers [2,3] and in the 1950’s, the treatment was introduced in the Netherlands, Belgium, and France.
In 2009, we reported the results of a multicenter, case control study, from the East of the Netherlands, comparing brachytherapy with cystectomy in solitary bladder cancer, and demonstrated no difference in survival and less toxicity in favor of brachytherapy [4], not to mention impact on quality of life!
In 2012, a multicenter study by Koning et al. confirmed a 75% local control (LC) in 1,040 patients treated between 1983-2010 in twelve Dutch departments [5].
In a recent meta-analysis comparing radical cystectomy with combined modality treatment, no difference in overall survival at 5 years or progression-free survival at 10 years was found in a cohort of 9,554 patients [6]. The meta-analysis included two Dutch studies, in which EBRT was combined with a brachytherapy boost, and whereby the patients kept a functional bladder.
According to the recommendations of the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie – European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO), brachytherapy is an essential part of the treatment to be applied after EBRT to a cumulative dose of 70 Gy EQD2 [7].
In Arnhem, in this way, we have currently treated 211 patients for bladder cancer. In 2009, the treatment was modified by using a Da Vinci robot to laparoscopically implant brachytherapy catheters and by applying high-dose-rate (HDR) instead of low-dose-rate brachy­the­rapy [8]. The procedure was augmented by position verification of the catheters with the use of computed tomography [9].
Nowadays, the indications for the brachytherapy-based bladder sparing procedure are: T2 solitary tumor diameter < 5 cm, in patients with general condition allowing anesthesia. Bladder neck location was in the past considered as contraindication. However, this area can be implanted with the robot technique, unless there is an infiltration in ostium of prostatic urethra.
Compared to the open-surgery implantation technique and using pulsed-dose-rate, the robot assisted procedure and HDR resulted in substantially shortened hospitalization time and less perioperative toxicity.

References

1. Skowronek J. Current status of brachytherapy in cancer treatment – short overview. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9: 581-589.
2. Herger CC, Sauer HR. Radium treatment of cancer of the bladder. Am J Roentgenol 1942; 47: 909-915.
3. Barringer BS. Twenty-five years of radon treatment of cancer of the bladder. J Am Med Assoc 1947; 135: 616-618.
4. Van der Steen-Banasik E, Ploeg M, Witjes J et al. Brachytherapy versus cystectomy in solitary bladder cancer: A case control, multicentre East-Netherlands study. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93: 352-357.
5. Koning CC, Blank LE, Koedooder C et al. Brachytherapy after external beam radiotherapy and limited surgery preserves bladders for patients with solitary pT1-PT3 bladder tumors. Ann Oncol 2012; 23: 2948-2953.
6. Vashista V, Wang H, Mazzone A et al. Radical cystectomy compared to combined modality treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 97: 1002-1020.
7. Pieters BR, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Smits GA et al. GEC-ESTRO/ACROP recommendations for performing bladder-sparing treatment with brachytherapy for muscle –invasive bladder carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2017; 122: 340-346.
8. Van der Steen-Banasik EM, Smits GA, Oosterveld BJ et al. The Curie-Da Vinci connection: 5 years’ experience with laparoscopic (robot-assisted) implantation for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of solitary T2 bladder tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95: 1439-1442.
9. Bus SJEA, Leus NG, Oosterveld BJ et al. An evaluation of our experience in position verification of catheters used for interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy of solitary bladder tumors. Brachytherapy 2018; 17: 24-30.
Copyright: © 2018 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.