eISSN: 2081-2841
ISSN: 1689-832X
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Current Issue Archive Supplements Articles in Press Journal Information Aims and Scope Editorial Office Editorial Board Register as Author Register as Reviewer Instructions for Authors Abstracting and indexing Subscription Advertising Information Links
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search
1/2024
vol. 16
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Feasibility and clinical implementation of MRI-guided surface brachytherapy

Michael J. Lavelle
1
,
Evangelia Kaza
1
,
Christian V. Guthier
1
,
Desmond A. O’Farrell
1
,
Thomas C. Harris
1
,
Robert A. Cormack
1
,
Phillip M. Devlin
1
,
Ivan M. Buzurovic
1

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, USA
J Contemp Brachytherapy 2024; 16, 1: 48–56
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.135647
Online publish date: 2024/02/23
View full text Get citation
 
Purpose:
Best practices for high-dose-rate surface applicator brachytherapy treatment (SABT) have long relied on computed tomography (CT)-based imaging to visualize diseased sites for treatment planning. Compared with magnetic resonance (MR)-based imaging, CT provides insufficient soft tissue contrast. This work described the feasibility of clinical implementation of MR-based imaging in SABT planning to provide individualized treatment optimization.

Material and methods:
A 3D-printed phantom was used to fit Freiberg flap-style (Elekta, The Netherlands) applicator. Images were taken using an optimized pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) MR sequence for catheter visualization, and a helical CT scan to generate parallel treatment plans. This clinical study included three patients undergoing SABT for Dupuytren’s contracture/palmar fascial fibromatosis imaged with the same modalities. SABT planning was performed in Oncentra Brachy (Elekta Brachytherapy, The Netherlands) treatment planning software. A geometric analysis was conducted by comparing CT-based digitization with MR-based digitization. CT and MR dwell positions underwent a rigid registration, and average Euclidean distances between dwell positions were calculated. A dosimetric comparison was performed, including point-based dose difference calculations and volumetric segmentations with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) calculations.

Results:
Euclidean distances between dwell positions from CT-based and MR-based plans were on average 0.68 ±0.05 mm and 1.35 ±0.17 mm for the phantom and patients, respectively. The point dose difference calculations were on average 0.92% for the phantom and 1.98% for the patients. The D95 and D90 DSC calculations were both 97.9% for the phantom, and on average 93.6% and 94.2%, respectively, for the patients.

Conclusions:
The sub-millimeter accuracy of dwell positions and high DSC’s (> 0.95) of the phantom demonstrated that digitization was clinically acceptable, and accurate treatment plans were produced using MR-only imaging. This novel approach, MRI-guided SABT, will lead to individualized prescriptions for potentially improved patient outcomes.

keywords:

brachytherapy, magnetic resonance, high-dose-rate, surface brachytherapy

  
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.