2/2007
vol. 45
Rare C-6 vertebral involvement in a child with histiocytosis X: Case report
Folia Neuropathol 2007; 45 (2): 93-97
Online publish date: 2007/06/14
Get citation
Introduction
The term “histiocytosis X” was originally used to cover a spectrum of three diseases: eosinophilic granuloma, Hand-Schüller-Christian disease, and Letterer-Siwe disease. Hand-Schüller-Christian disease has become a synonym for multifocal Langerhans cell histocytosis [LCG]. The term Langerhans’ cell histio-cytosis (LCH) [1-3,7,9,10,14] reflects the belief that
this disease is a true “histiocytosis”. Some prefer the term Langerhans’ cell granulomatosis (LCG) to avoid confusion with the term histiocytosis X because there is some evidence to support the view that the Langerhans’ cell is not a member of the mononuclear phagocyte system and hence not a tissue macrophage (or histiocyte) [8,15,18].
A patient with histiocytosis X requires local and systemic staging to differentiate isolated eosinophilic granulomas of the bone, multiple eosinophilic granulomas of the bone, and visceral disseminated disease. Medical management then varies according to the extension of the disease. Systemic chemotherapy may be indicated in patients with extraosseous lesions. Radiological investigations are recommended to look for instability of the spine. Lesions that are strictly confined to the vertebral body and reveal no instability would normally not require surgical treatment.
Histiocytosis X of the vertebral column is very rare. In a clinical situation, pathological alterations within the vertebral body should include a differential diagnosis of eosinophilic granuloma [11-13,19]. An unusual case of spinal cord compression caused by eosinophilic granuloma histiocytosis X of the vertebral body of C-6 in a 12-year-old boy was recently cared for in our department. Pathological examination revealed a rare case of an eosinophilic granuloma of the vertebral body of C6.
Case report
The patient presented with weakness of both upper extremities along with severe limitation in range of motion at the neck. Neurological examination revealed motor weakness of 3/5 without atrophy in the distal upper extremities. The bicep/tricep deep tendon reflexes were normal. Computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine revealed an expansile osteolytic lesion in the C-6 body. Loss of the C-6 body height was also noted. Of more concern was the finding of a narrowing of the spinal canal with cord compression secondary to the expansile lesion (Fig. 1). Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a straightening of the neck along with spinal cord compression secondary to soft tissue expansion of C-5 and C-6
(Fig. 2 left). An MRI with contrast was also performed; no contrast enhancement was noted (Fig. 2 right).
A comprehensive history was taken together with a complete physical examination. Lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and involvement of skin, other organ systems and the limbs were not evident. All investigations including history, physical examination, laboratory findings and radiological evaluations did not demonstrate any evident involvement in any other organs or systems. All the mentioned observations were in favour of a unifocal unisystem C-6 vertebral body lesion and therefore surgical removal of the mass was chosen as the most appropriate treatment.
An anterior cervical approach was used to reach the cervical spine. A C-6 corpectomy was completed; the spine was stabilized with placement of a fibular strut graft, which was stabilized with a plate. A C-6 body lesion biopsy was sent for pathological assessment. The pathology specimens showed fragments of bony tissue with infiltration of Langerhans cells accompanied by a mixture of eosinophils, giant cells, neutrophils and foamy cells (Fig. 3). The immunohistochemistry for S-100, positive in Langerhans cells, was performed to confirm the histiocytic origin of the process (Fig. 4). The patient made an uneventful recovery from surgery. Over the next three months, the patient’s motor function demonstrated significant improvement with no new neurological deficits. Three months post operatively, there was no evidence of spinal cord compression on radiological images of the cervical spine (Fig. 5). Moreover, at three and twelve months after surgery, history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and radiological evaluations did not demonstrate any involvement in other organs, systems, bones or vertebrae.
Discussion
We report a patient who had eosinophilic granuloma histiocytosis X with isolated C-6 vertebra involvement. Compression of the spinal cord resulted in upper extremity weakness involving both arms along with severe limitation of neck movements. In reviewing the literature, Gandolfi [11] reported an unusual case of spinal cord compression also caused by histiocytosis X of the vertebral body of T-7, which was surgically corrected. Greinacher and Gutjahr et al. [12] presented three children with histiocytosis X and vertebral involvement. These authors noted that even with vertebral destruction neurological abnormalities were not present. Boriani et al. [4] assessed thirty-five cases of vertebral histiocytosis with a total of 52 vertebrae affected. They noted that the diagnosis was based on radiology only in typical cases; and in cases of malignant neoplastic lesions, the diagnosis might be missed. These authors proposed orthotic stabilization and/or surgical treatment based on the extent of the lesion and the potential for further progression. Kayser et al. [17] reported six children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis who underwent operative treatment. These authors also noted that in cases of vertebral Langerhans cell histiocytosis, differentiating these lesions from spinal osteomyelitis may be difficult. In a recent study done by Brown
et al. [5], of 8 children who were found to have vertebral Langerhans cell histiocytosis, the most common presenting complaint was back or neck pain. The thoracic vertebrae were most commonly affected followed equally by cervical and lumbar vertebrae. These authors advocated bracing, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy depending on the severity of the presenting complaint. Cardon et al. [6] performed percutaneous vertebroplasty with acrylic cement in the treatment of a 25-year-old patient with Langerhans cell vertebral histiocytosis. These authors clearly emphasized that this technique should be reserved for adults only.
In various reviews of the literature a number of authors have discussed different cases of vertebral histiocytosis X with different backgrounds and diagnostic techniques. Treatment clearly varies according to the severity of the disease, the spread of the lesion, and any unusual progression. In our case, the vertebral involvement was in a cervical vertebra of which there are very few cases in the literature. To treat this patient we removed the affected vertebrae and placed a fibula strut graft which was fixated with a plate. Brown et al. [5] performed a similar surgery with a vertebral fusion in one child via a thoracotomy and debridement of the lesion followed by anterior strut grafting.
Conclusions
Diagnosing histiocytosis in the paediatric spine may require several studies. A CT scan is helpful in localizing these lesions. An MRI should follow if there is any question of neural involvement. A biopsy is often helpful but should be done in the least invasive manner. In our case, the diagnosis was obtained from the patient’s history and imaging techniques followed by assessment of pathological biopsy. The surgical operation was based on the goal of cord decompression and additional stabilization using a fibular strut graft. The resolution of the neurological findings and the stabilization of the neck with the graft suggest this is a useful technique.
References
1. Abellan Martinez MC, Mendez Martinez P, Sanchez Gascon F, Hernandez Martinez J, Sanchez Monton T, Romero Mas E. Pulmonary histiocytosis X. Report of a case and review of the literature. An Med Interna 2002; 19: 16-18.
2. Aster J. The Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Systems. In: Kumar V, Cotran RS, Robbins SL (eds). Robbins Basic Pathology. Saunders, Philadelphia 2003; pp. 441-442.
3. Bochenek G, Mejza F, Nizankowska-Mogilnicka E. Pulmonary histiocytosis X. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2003; 109: 633-639.
4. Boriani S, Donati D, Picci P, Savini R, Mancini AF, Lucchi A, Marchi N. Vertebral histiocytosis. Chir Organi Mov 1990; 75: 15-24.
5. Brown CW, Jarvis JG, Letts M, Carpenter B. Treatment and outcome of vertebral Langerhans cell histiocytosis at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario. Can J Surg 2005; 48: 230-236.
6. Cardon T, Hachulla E, Flipo RM, Chastanet P, Rose C, Deprez X, Duquesnoy B, Delcambre B, Devulder B. Percutaneous vertebroplasty with acrylic cement in the treatment of a Langer-hans cell vertebral histiocytosis. Clin Rheumatol 1994; 13:
518-521.
7. Coppes-Zantinga A, Egeler RM. The Langerhans cell histiocytosis X files revealed. Br J Haematol 2002; 116: 3-9.
8. Delobbe A, Durieu J, Duhamel A, Wallaert B. Determinants of survival in pulmonary Langerhans’ cell granulomatosis (histiocytosis X). Groupe d’Etude en Pathologie Interstitielle de la Societe de Pathologie Thoracique du Nord. Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 2002-2006.
9. Fluri S, Gebbers JO. Langerhans cell histiocytoses: 50 years to histiocytosis X. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 2004; 93: 559-565.
10. Gabbay E, Dark JH, Ashcroft T, Milne D, Gibson GJ, Healy M, Corris PA. Recurrence of Langerhans’ cell granulomatosis following lung transplantation. Thorax 1998; 53: 326-327.
11. Gandolfi A. Vertebral histiocytosis-X causing spinal cord compression. Surg Neurol 1983; 19: 369-372.
12. Greinacher I, Gutjahr P. Vertebral changes in histiocytosis x (author’s transl). Radiologe 1978; 18: 228-232.
13. Gugliantini P, Orazi C, Boldrini R. Vertebral monostotic histiocytosis-X with intraspinal spread. Usefulness of CT. Radiol Med (Torino) 1989; 77: 697-700.
14. Habib SB, Congleton J, Carr D, Partridge J, Corrin B, Geddes DM, Banner N, Yacoub M, Burke M. Recurrence of recipient Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis following bilateral lung transplantation. Thorax 1998; 53: 323-325.
15. Hage C, Willman CL, Favara BE, Isaacson PG. Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis (histiocytosis X): immunophenotype and growth fraction. Hum Pathol 1993; 24: 840-845.
16. Jouve JL, Bollini G, Jacquemier M, Bouyala JM. 15 cases of vertebral involvement of histiocytosis X in children. Review of the literature. Ann Pediatr (Paris) 1991; 38: 167-174.
17. Kayser R, Mahlfeld K, Grasshoff H. Vertebral Langerhans-cell histiocytosis in childhood – a differential diagnosis of spinal osteomyelitis. Klin Padiatr 1999; 211: 399-402.
18. Lieberman PH, Jones CR, Steinman RM, Erlandson RA, Smith J, Gee T, Huvos A, Garin-Chesa P, Filippa DA, Urmacher C, Gangi MD, Sperber M. Langerhans cell (eosinophilic) granulomatosis.
A clinicopathologic study encompassing 50 years. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20: 519-552.
19. Rigault P, Finidori G. Vertebral localizations of histiocytosis X. Orthopedic aspects. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1977; 63 Suppl 2: 190-194.
Copyright: © 2007 Mossakowski Medical Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences and the Polish Association of Neuropathologists. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
|
|